TZUTC: 0100   
   MSGID: 5388.fidonet_memories@2:250/3 2d25c2a9   
   REPLY: 26719.memoryln@1:2320/105 2d247bde   
   PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Linux master/3949a52df Sep 07 2025 GCC 8.5.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.29-Linux master/3949a52df Sep 07 2025 GCC 8.5.0   
   COLS: 80   
   BBSID: MAGNUMUK   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   FORMAT: flowed   
   NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.105   
     Re: I watched a movie the oth   
     By: Mike Powell to BOB WORM on Mon Sep 08 2025 08:43:27   
      
   Hi, Mike.   
      
    > That is interesting!  I wonder what made them settle on 8 vs. some other   
    > number (like 10).  Maybe that is the number of seconds it takes the average   
    > user to realize something is being said and hit the button?   
      
   I just sent my friend a message asking those questions. No doubt he'll send me   
   a multi-screener of a reply - he's a helpful guy and likes to give precise   
   answers.   
      
   I see he's typing... wait for it...   
      
   5 minutes now and still going :\   
      
   He says:   
      
   I think the machine with the DUMP button (I didn't prompt him on this!) was   
   seven seconds. I don't think there was a mandatory length but there is a   
   practical minimum - enough time for the thing to be said and for the person in   
   charge of the button to react. Also there are / were cost constraints cos of   
   all the (static?) memory needed. Erm. Seven stereo servings at ? 32kHz and ?12   
   or 14 bits?   
      
   So I asked what happens if you dump then someone swears again:   
      
   Depends on your procedures I suppose. Often, pressing DUMP would be followed   
   by a 7 second jingle, works with tape delay. The electronic device was   
   supposed to "seamlessly" stretch silences and gradually get that 7s back so if   
   you were relying on that you'd be stuffed.   
      
   There was no legal requirement for it to be in circuit :-)   
      
   The one time it would have been useful (Rik Mayall, just before I started) it   
   wasn't in use.   
      
   BobW: So it works pretty much how I remembered but a second less buffer   
   (maybe, he concedes his brain is a decade older than mine) and I never knew   
   about the jingle which let it rebuild the buffer immediately. oh, and if   
   you're not familiar with Rik Mayall he's a legend, look him up!   
      
   Apparently there were fancier versions of that machine (which was a 1985   
   model) which allowed a "half dump" - if you can imagine such a thing.   
      
   BobW   
   --- SBBSecho 3.29-Linux   
    * Origin: >>> Magnum BBS <<< - magnumbbs.net (2:250/3)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/120 18/0 19/10 25/0 21 104/119 105/81 106/201 114/10 116/116   
   SEEN-BY: 120/302 616 123/0 25 126 180 525 755 3001 3002 128/187 129/14   
   SEEN-BY: 129/305 135/115 153/757 7715 154/10 30 50 110 700 218/700   
   SEEN-BY: 218/840 220/6 30 70 90 221/1 6 360 222/2 226/17 18 30 44   
   SEEN-BY: 226/50 227/114 229/110 206 300 317 400 426 428 470 664 700   
   SEEN-BY: 229/705 250/0 1 3 4 5 7 8 11 13 14 15 17 266/512 267/800   
   SEEN-BY: 275/1000 280/464 291/111 292/854 301/1 320/219 322/757 335/364   
   SEEN-BY: 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/267 280 281 384 418   
   SEEN-BY: 633/420 2744 712/848 1321 770/1 100 340 350 772/210 220 230   
   SEEN-BY: 902/26 2320/105 3634/0 12 24 27 56 57 58 60 5075/35   
   PATH: 250/3 1 3634/12 154/10 221/6 218/840 770/1 633/280 229/426