Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    MEMORIES    |    Nostalgia for the past... today sucks    |    24,715 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 24,392 of 24,715    |
|    Kurt Weiske to Mike Powell    |
|    Re: PI to 104 Decimal Places    |
|    28 Aug 25 07:42:58    |
      TZUTC: -0700       MSGID: 23385.memories@1:218/700 2d15fc4b       REPLY: 26675.memoryln@1:2320/105 2d14ab2c       PID: Synchronet 3.21a-Win32 master/955e50fea Aug 09 2025 MSC 1942       TID: SBBSecho 3.29-Win32 master/955e50fea Aug 09 2025 MSC 1942       BBSID: REALITY       CHRS: CP437 2       FORMAT: flowed       -=> Mike Powell wrote to ED VANCE <=-               MP> When I was younger I remember some folks having those fancy TI        MP> calculators, and I also remember the "manual" was a pretty large one...        MP> in my memory, it was at least as thick as the calculator. ;)               One of those teachers who make an impression on you was a calculus        teacher I had in college. He had an interesting approach to come at        problems from a different perspective to help you understand them.               In the movie "Ender's Game", when Ender says "The Enemy's Gate is        Always Down" and the perspective changes, I thought of his class.               We were encouraged to buy programmable calculators - the stepwise kind        where you could automate steps into the calculator as a procedure, then        enter a series of X and Y values and it would step through them - a        precursor to graphing calculators, as you'd have to plot them        yourselves.               The rich kids in the class brought HP 41C calculators. Oh, how I wanted        one of those! I had to settle for a cheap Casio programmable with 30 or        so program steps, total.               My professor's opinion was that computers would soon do all of the        grunt work that mathmeticians did by hand now. With computers, you'd be        freed to do the creative work and let the computers grind out the        results.               It struck a chord with me.               A year before, I flunked a senior year high school math class and        was required to take another course. The only one available mid-year        was Computer Problem Solving, which inspired me to work with computers.               If I hadn't flunked that class, I would have completely missed the        experience of the teacher who reinforced the value of computers as        tools of computation and might not have been as inspired.               Despite years of experience, I still enjoy doing computations and        turning the calculator upside down to spell 80081E5. I suppose your        inner child never *really* grows up.                             --- MultiMail/Win v0.52        * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)       SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 102/401 103/1 705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/187       SEEN-BY: 129/14 305 153/7715 154/110 214/22 218/0 1 215 601 610 700       SEEN-BY: 218/810 840 860 880 226/30 227/114 229/110 206 300 317 400       SEEN-BY: 229/426 428 470 664 700 705 266/512 291/111 292/854 301/1       SEEN-BY: 320/219 322/757 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 902/26       SEEN-BY: 5075/35       PATH: 218/700 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca