Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    MEMORIES    |    Nostalgia for the past... today sucks    |    24,715 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 23,530 of 24,715    |
|    George Pope to Mike Powell    |
|    Re: Inventions    |
|    15 Mar 22 08:17:46    |
      MSGID: 1:153/757.0 26a14097       REPLY: 25800.memoryln@1:2320/105 26914eb7       TZUTC: -0700       CHRS: LATIN-1 2       >> > Otherwise we might pull another 1812 on ya!       >> I'm pretty sure we won that one, along with the Pig Wars & 54/40. . .       > That one is a funny one. Canada can claim being a winner because they kept       > the US south of the border. The US can claim being a winner because we       > defeated the British in the south. The British appear to have lost on both       > fronts. :)              Nah, we didn't lose -- we owned half of yas for a while (straight down the        Mississippie corridor to the Gulf of Mexico); we didn't lose anything of ours -       - you lost a huge part of yours for some time; we gave it back to settle things       at the end & get rid of a bunch of our French.              >> We even made you keep a bunch of our unwanteds (French Acadians, now called       > "       >> juns")       > That may have been the biggest revenge of all! :O              Nah, that was why we "won"! ;)               We didn't need all that extra land we had -- we just took it to show we could.              &, yes, I am aware you subtly put forth that the war was between the USA & the        British, 55 years before "Canada" formed; but we used the term Canada already        (Upper & Lower Canada for what's now Quebec & Ontario)              The men who chased yours to the Gulf wore British uniforms, but called        themselves Canadians(in English)              Just joking about, mate!              Let's call it a tie, so out of 3 wars with youse, Canada won 2.5!              Pretty good odds.              Your generals have been planning another ever since, but realized it would be        impossible to win, so dropped them all.              I have a copy of a White Paper drawn up by some 5-star generals in the 1990s        covering an exploration of a full frontal attack on British Columbia (north       of your Washington State) which concluded it to be unfeasible, & that doing       so would result in too many losses (men, ordnance, & reputation) to the US.              The older plans to invade Canada's centre are public domain now, & likewise        were rtuled unfeasible.              It's better we stay friends.               You get decent lumber, ores, & fish -- we get paid for same.              We get some not far away places to have a sunny & warm winter vacation,       paying for it, of course. . .              BC offers some of the best sdkiing this side of the Alps. . .              It's betterthis way -- as brothers (but in the wrestling match that is our        sibling rivalry, we're bigger & on top.)              That's where Uncle Sam came from; we had a general na,ed Samuel some thing-or-       other & he ordered you to "say 'uncle.'"!              & like in your anthem, you romanticised losing a major battle & used it as a        rallying cry for all Americans ever since, to take up arms & fight, fight,        fight!              Best to yas, mate!              [DISCLAIMER]       Author of this echo post assumes no reesponsibility for any of this post       being taken too seriously. Author suggests all feeling the burn(not "The       Bern") to check the echo's name. ;)                             --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-6        * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 90/1 105/81 106/201 120/340 123/131 129/305 330       SEEN-BY: 129/331 134/100 138/146 153/105 135 141 757 7715 218/700       SEEN-BY: 221/6 226/30 227/114 229/110 206 307 317 400 424 426 428       SEEN-BY: 229/452 664 700 240/5832 266/512 267/67 275/100 1000 280/464       SEEN-BY: 282/1038 292/854 301/1 317/3 320/219 322/757 342/11 200 396/45       SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/280 640/1321 712/848 3634/12       PATH: 153/757 7715 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca