home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   MEMORIES      Nostalgia for the past... today sucks      24,715 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 23,111 of 24,715   
   George Pope to JOE MACKEY   
   Re: Old books and weather   
   15 Dec 21 12:54:06   
   
   TZUTC: -0800   
   MSGID: 1961.fido-memories@1:153/757.2 261f9397   
   REPLY: 1:135/392 28569f72   
   PID: Synchronet 3.19a-Linux master/4ce690049 Dec 15 2021 GCC 11.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Linux master/4ce690049 Dec 15 2021 GCC 11.2.0   
   BBSID: TRMB   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
    > >>   Absolutely.  I think that ball of fire in the sky has more to do with   
    > our weather than anything humans can do.   
      
    > > & you'd be 100% right, per my research!   
      
    >   Of course I'm right.  I'm always right.  Its just a curse I have to bear.   
    > :)   
      
   I hear ya: I'm not always right, but I'm never wrong.   
      
    >    I get a chuckle when people say humans are causing all the problems then   
    > try to explain ice ages and warm periods over the eons when humans had   
    > nothing to do with it.   
      
   Exactly.   
      
    >    And also just what is the perfect weather?  Ice ages?  Warm periods?   
    >    I'll watch some show from 30 years ago how the weather changed and it   
    > was called weather.  Now its human caused climate change.   
      
   Indeed.  Pretty basic -- you & I didn't exercise special genius to figure this   
   one out.   
      
   I assume every anthropgenic climate change screamer is deliberately & knowingly   
   lying & committing mass fraud, as they HAVE to know better.   
      
   The one that out & out peed me off is the ads showing glaciers breaking off   
   into the ocean & voiceover pointed out how the glaciers are shrinking at an   
   astronomically fast rate.   
      
   WTFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF??????????????????   
      
   I paid attention in school, mostly, but enough to know that as glaciers GROW,   
   they "calve" pieces into the ocean, which become ice bergs.   
      
   Now I'm hearing a polar(NPI) opposite explanation. . . that's worded in such   
   away, with the visual, that the majority of tv viewers will eat it up,   
   unquestioningly. & then elect people & effect public policy changes based on   
   this flawed perception of Earth's reality   
      
   This makes me more irate than anty of the other "climate change" lies!   
      
   You recall, too, how it was all "global warming" throughout the '80s, unmtil it   
   was decisively proved the Earth is acrtually cooling (consistent with being in   
   an ice age event that's within a bigger Ice Age period)   
      
   Then. . ."climate change" (highfalutin' word for "weather")   
      
   *sigh* Surrounded by morons whose collective vote does nothing to find out   
   facts. . . just keep electing the liars & cheats who campaign solely on this   
   web of lies. . .    
      
   It's RUDE, as these stastements from on high are them saying they think I'm a   
   moron, too, & can't see black & white for what they are (not pink & green)   
      
   & if I say anything, I'm the arsehole, & immediately dismissed.   
      
   Same as anyone pointing out the obvious flaw in the official story re the   
   killing of JFK (bullets don't boomerang & hit the target from the other side)   
      
   They've spun their crap so well, that immediately, on hearing facvtsm they put   
   up blocks ("conspiracy nut"); instead of hearing "grassy knoll" as an obvious   
   error in the official story, they treat it as "conspiracy theory". . .   
      
   I'm so thankful I was taught to question everything & look for corroborating   
   data before coming to any conclusion, whether on my own or fed to me.   
      
   I's amazing how they've managed to get the generat8uions sdpo baffled that   
   there's now about 400 million North Americans (USA & Canada) who,. for the   
   majoruity, trabidly proclaim the lies they've been spoon-fed.   
      
   They eagerly await the dying off of our generation.  Thankfully they don't see   
   too much need to rush this natural process, as we're such a small minority   
   we're easily dismissed as old kooks! :( & no danger to upsetting their ill-   
   gotten applecart.   
      
   I must keep trying; my having seen every episode of Star Trek, the Original   
   Series, compels me. . .   
      
    > > My other take on the situatoin relies more on others' cynicism, as I've   
    > > noted the climate change criers are the ones burhning more fossil fuels   
    > > than any of the rest of us!   
      
    >   Such as all those private jets going to Glasgow of that recent summit?    
      
   You picked up on that, too, all met by a phalanx of gas-burning stretch   
   limousines at the airport, to whisk everyone to a 4-star hotel?   
      
   I look around for those who picked up on that & it's just you, me, & a couple   
   professional comics.   
      
    > > & it's funny how all the leaders of the movement have recently spent   
    > > 7-figures each buying ocean-front properties (That's like paying thousands   
    > > for a sand castle as the tide is coming in)   
      
    >   One would think they would buy property far inland...   
      
   Kind of how I figureed it would go if they actually believed the tripe they   
   spew.  So, hmm. . . what can I conclude by that. Thees people aren't stupid,   
   just evil.   
      
    >   I find second usage for a lot of stuff.   
    >   No particular order: old metal coffee cans for things like rice, sugar,   
    > etc.   
    >   Old two litre bottles for juices, etc.   
    >   Slivers of soap squeezed onto new bars.   
    >   Old while cotton socks for cleaning rags.   
    >   Cloth rags for cleaning rather than paper towels.   
    >   I have a whole lot of things I use over and over.   
    >   I was raised on:   
    >   Use it up,   
    >   Wear it out,   
    >   Make it do,   
    >   Or do without.   
      
   I love it! How should I cite this when I share to my recycling group?   
      
   I've got it as:   
      
   ~# via Joe Mackey on Fido MEMORIES #~   
   "I was raised on:   
   'Use it up,   
   Wear it out,   
   Make it do,   
   Or do without.'"   
      
   Unless you prefer otherwise?   
      
   Your friend,   
      
   <+]:{)}   
   Cyberpope, Bishop of ROM   
   --- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux   
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757.2)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 124/5016 129/305 134/100   
   SEEN-BY: 153/0 105 135 757 7715 154/10 203/0 221/0 6 226/30 227/114   
   SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 428 452 664 700 240/5832 249/206 307 317 400   
   SEEN-BY: 267/67 280/464 5003 282/1038 292/854 301/1 317/3 322/757   
   SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/120 633/280 712/848 770/1 2452/250   
   PATH: 153/757 280/464 292/854 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca