TZUTC: -0500   
   MSGID: 25319.memoryln@1:2320/105 26102b01   
   REPLY: 1886.fido-memories@1:153/757.2 260fac04   
   PID: Synchronet 3.18c-Linux master/dcb003099 Dec 31 2020 GCC 7.5.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.12-Linux master/dcb003099 Dec 31 2020 GCC 7.5.0   
   BBSID: CAPCITY2   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   >  > No.  In this day and age, what the Beatles did back then seems so very   
   tame   
   >  > in comparison.  :)   
      
   > I meant where were ou as in when in the era & where in the attutudes. . .   
      
   I was not around yet.  :)   
      
   > I considered the music mellow, mainstream, & as inoffensive as you get, but I   
   > guess just one or two trilling riffs is all it took to get certain parents   
   all   
   > afluster!   
      
   Maybe they didn't like the later, psychedelic stuff the Beatles did but my   
   understanding is that they were up in arms about them long before then.   
      
   > Likely there was parental banning of innovations in classical, too, back then   
   > when it was new & current. . .   
      
   I cannot remember his name now, but there was a very controversial   
   violinist back in the day.  I forget the story now, but he supposedly had   
   women fainting in the aisles.  This would have been sometime before 1900   
   (maybe before 1800!).   
      
   > I'm fine with lookikng out for what young people are exposed to, as it can   
   lea   
   > to them losing their cuildhood/youth too early. . .   
      
   A lot of it can.  I feel like today, most parents do little to keep them   
   from being exposed.   
      
   > The ratings thing was never helpful in limiting exposure, as e   
   eryone(includin   
   > children) started buying those marked R most!   
   >   
   > My theory is the industries (film & music) wanted those ratings in lace, but   
   > were happy to make it seem as if the censors did it!   
      
   Yes, the explicit lyrics labels.  I am certain they sold a few records.   
      
   Mike   
      
      
    * SLMR 2.1a * Politically incorrect...and proud of it!!!   
   --- SBBSecho 3.12-Linux   
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 90/1 105/81 120/340 457 616 123/10 131 124/5016   
   SEEN-BY: 129/305 153/757 154/10 30 40 50 700 203/0 220/80 90 221/0   
   SEEN-BY: 221/6 226/18 30 227/114 201 229/424 426 428 452 664 700 240/1120   
   SEEN-BY: 240/2100 5138 5234 5411 5824 5832 5853 249/206 307 317 400   
   SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 282/1038 292/854 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219   
   SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/120 633/280 712/848 770/1 2320/0   
   SEEN-BY: 2320/33 105 195 304 2452/250 2454/119 3634/12   
   PATH: 2320/105 154/10 280/464 240/5832 229/426