Hello Andrew!   
      
   Monday January 14 2019 02:45, you wrote to me:   
      
    > Hello Vince!   
      
    > 10 Jan 19 14:31, you wrote to me:   
      
    VC>>>> I have reported this before as far as the first isue but found   
    VC>>>> a second problem :   
      
    VC>>>> 1.  The size counts are double than the actual figures.   
    VC>>>> 2.  Aging is also wrong but in this case way wrong for example   
    VC>>>> showing a node   
    VC>>>>     with   
    VC>>>>     ...H..   0  33010108 10/20h 2:250/9@fidonet   
      
    VC>>>>  where the files arrived over the last two days and mail   
    VC>>>> packets only go back 2 days.   
      
    >>> I will take a look at this over the next few days.  I think the   
    >>> age may be the last successful outbound connect to that system,   
    >>> but I won't know until I look at the code.  As far as the size   
    >>> issue, I should be able to check that at the same time.   
      
    > My initial review of the code did not turn up anything that looks out   
    > of whack. I even manually added up what was in the queue for one of my   
    > downlinks that was marked undialable, and it came out exactly to the   
    > byte on size, and the age appeared to be that of the oldest file in   
    > the queue for him.  Does the node that you see the problem with use a   
    > filebox?   
      
   No, no nodes have boxes set up.   
      
   Had problems with them a few years back that may have been the reason why some   
   nodes was getting echos for others so just killed them all off.   
      
      
   Vince   
      
   --- Mageia Linux v6 X64/Mbse v1.0.7.11/GoldED+/LNX 1.1.501-b20150715   
    * Origin: Air Applewood, The Linux Gateway to the UK & Eire (2:250/1)