home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   MBSE      The Linux/FreeBSD MBSE BBS Support Echo      2,445 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,648 of 2,445   
   Vince Coen to mark lewis   
   Filefind file limit   
   31 Oct 17 17:47:20   
   
   Hello mark!   
      
   Wednesday October 25 2017 11:10, you wrote to me:   
      
   Mbse has a fixed limit of 60 and 64, so short of changing the code I am stuck.   
      
   It was only an idea any way of reducing resources.   
      
      
    >  On 2017 Oct 25 14:36:30, you wrote to Andrew Leary:   
      
    AL>>> In the future, I can look at possibly splitting large replies   
    AL>>> into multiple messages.   
      
    VC>> In mbse there is a 60/64k message limit does this still apply in   
    VC>> fido land these days with internet comms used for most if not all   
    VC>> sysops ?   
      
    > there never was a limit on message size... what everyone has been   
    > seeing is arbitrary limits placed by ""lazy"" coders*... the tech   
    > standard states that message bodies are unbounded which means there is   
    > no limit set... this leaves plenty of room for expansion as technology   
    > grows... we can see this by this very 64k barrier... it used to be   
    > 32k... these days, memory is accessed differently and the barrier is   
    > much much larger... effectively, each system is limited by drive   
    > space*N where N is the number of copies of the message a system makes   
    > when processing the message... copies because of sending to other   
    > systems in a distribution system (eg: fidonet)...   
      
      
    > * ""lazy"" coders: those who didn't implement some sort of disk-based   
    > overflow system so they could process messages too large to fit into   
    > the memory allocation scheme of the time... sure, the larger messages   
    > would be processed slower but they would be processed and passed on...   
    > no need for splitting... splitting should be done only when the   
    > messages are stored in a local message base that has arbitrary message   
    > size limits in place... split the message when initially stored...   
    > reassemble it into one when exporting it to other systems (eg: they   
    > rescanned the area)... the ^ASPLIT spec is perfect for this but some   
    > chose to use it at another point in the process...   
      
      
   Vince   
      
   --- Mageia Linux v5/Mbse v1.0.7.2/GoldED+/LNX 1.1.501-b20150715   
    * Origin: Air Applewood, The Linux Gateway to the UK & Eire (2:250/1)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca