Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    MBSE    |    The Linux/FreeBSD MBSE BBS Support Echo    |    2,445 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 120 of 2,445    |
|    Jame Clay to Benny Pedersen    |
|    Re: MBSE Source Update [from repository     |
|    20 Feb 11 22:41:36    |
      clarity.)       idonet.mbse@mbdb6.(none)>       Hi Benny!              On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:58:12 -0500, Benny Pedersen wrote:       > 06 Feb 2011 19:06, RJ Clay wrote to Vince Coen:       >       > RC> http://git.rocasa.org/gitweb.cgi/mbsedeb.git.       >        > Vince should add patches to this ?               Eh? Why would he do that? I'd be more likely to pull from him, once I       get to the point of working on the debian packaging for the later       versions. (Though I do have a concern about the version numbers...)               Right now, I only have 0.92.0 of MBSE in the repo, since that's what       I'm working on for the Debian packaging, and I'm not doing any changes to       that MBSE code except as part of the packaging. I've done some work with       importing the old CVS repository, for the history; but Vince and others       (and even Michiel...) are working on later versions of MBSE and those I'd       pull from them.                      > i belive there is no need to have 2 git servers,               You do realize that git is a distributed vcs, right? (So is       Mercurial, which is what Michiel uses at the main repo, though I like       GIT better...) Which means that there can be at least as many code       repositories as there are people working on the code. (Or more, see below...)       If there is a 'master' repository, that's defined by those working on it.                I'm running two repos just for the mbsedeb project I'm working on; one       is the local repo that I work from, which is on my local server. The       other is the public one (at git.rocasa.org) where I push the public       branches. (I keep any test etc branches separate from those...) If I       expect to have some time to work on it while I'm away from home, I just       clone my local repo to my netbook; I then have the entire repo available       to me, even If I'm offline. And if I make changes I want to keep, I can       push them back to my local repo when I'm home again.                            > it will end with 2 unstable mbse :(               Why do you think that? That's no more likely than with using any other       VCS.                                          Jame              --- MBSE BBS v0.92.0 (GNU/Linux-i386)        * Origin: Debian version 1~3 (1:120/545.3@fidonet)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca