Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    MATZDOBRE    |    The Mad Dog Matzdobre Echo    |    343 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 218 of 343    |
|    Jeff Binkley to All    |
|    Second Amendment    |
|    28 Jun 10 11:56:00    |
      The Consitution has prevailed but just barely. It is issues such as        this that point out why folks like Kagan should never be comfirmed and        liberals like Obama should never be elected...                      ===============================================              http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-       dyn/content/article/2010/06/28/AR2010062802134_pf.html                     Gun rights extended by Supreme Court              By MARK SHERMAN       The Associated Press       Monday, June 28, 2010; 10:46 AM                             WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court held Monday that the Constitution's        Second Amendment restrains government's ability to significantly limit        "the right to keep and bear arms," advancing a recent trend by the John        Roberts-led bench to embrace gun rights.               By a narrow, 5-4 vote, the justices also signaled, however, that some        limitations on the right could survive legal challenges.               Writing for the court in a case involving restrictive laws in Chicago        and one of its suburbs, Justice Samuel Alito said that the Second        Amendment right "applies equally to the federal government and the        states."               (Photos from a Patriot's Day gun rights rally)               The court was split along familiar ideological lines, with five        conservative-moderate justices in favor of gun rights and four liberals        opposed. Chief Justice Roberts voted with the majority.               Two years ago, the court declared that the Second Amendment protects an        individual's right to possess guns, at least for purposes of self-       defense in the home.               That ruling applied only to federal laws. It struck down a ban on        handguns and a trigger lock requirement for other guns in the District        of Columbia, a federal city with a unique legal standing. At the same        time, the court was careful not to cast doubt on other regulations of        firearms here.               Gun rights proponents almost immediately filed a federal lawsuit        challenging gun control laws in Chicago and its suburb of Oak Park, Ill,        where handguns have been banned for nearly 30 years. The Brady Center to        Prevent Gun Violence says those laws appear to be the last two remaining        outright bans.               Lower federal courts upheld the two laws, noting that judges on those        benches were bound by Supreme Court precedent and that it would be up to        the high court justices to ultimately rule on the true reach of the        Second Amendment.               The Supreme Court already has said that most of the guarantees in the        Bill of Rights serve as a check on state and local, as well as federal,        laws.               Monday's decision did not explicitly strike down the Chicago area laws,        ordering a federal appeals court to reconsider its ruling. But it left        little doubt that they would eventually fall.               Still, Alito noted that the declaration that the Second Amendment is        fully binding on states and cities "limits (but by no means eliminates)        their ability to devise solutions to social problems that suit local        needs and values."               --- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10        * Origin: (1:226/600)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca