Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    MATZDOBRE    |    The Mad Dog Matzdobre Echo    |    343 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 207 of 343    |
|    Jeff Binkley to All    |
|    Creibibility    |
|    14 Jul 10 11:04:00    |
      http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/434315b2-8ea6-11df-8a67-00144feab49a.html              Obama faces growing credibility crisis       By Edward Luce in Washington               Published: July 13 2010 18:51 | Last updated: July 13 2010 18:51              Robert Gibbs, Barack Obama’s chief spokesman, got into hot water this        week for daring to speak the truth – that the Democrats could lose        control of the House of Representatives in November. But it could be        even worse than that.               Contrary to pretty much every projection until now, Democratic control        of the Senate is also starting to coming into question. While Mr Obama’s        approval ratings have continued to fall, and now hover at dangerously        close to 40 per cent according an ABC-Washington Post poll published on        Tuesday, the fate of his former colleagues in the Senate looks even        worse.                      In the past few days polls have shown Republican challengers taking the        lead over previously safe Democratic incumbents, such as Barbara Boxer        in California and Russ Feingold in Wisconsin. Indeed, given the        uniformly negative direction in the numbers, it is now quite possible        the Republicans could win the Senate seats formerly held by both        President Obama in Illinois, and Joe Biden, vice-president, in Delaware.               Add to that the continuing woes of Harry Reid, the Senate Democratic        majority leader, in Nevada, where the Republican party’s recent        nomination of Sharron Angle, a far-right and highly eccentric Tea Party        supporter, appear to have had no positive effect on Mr Reid’s prospects,        and the Grand Old party has a good shot at taking control of both houses        of Congress. Worse for Mr Obama, political scientists say that at this        stage in the calendar, there is almost nothing he can do about it.               “If you ask me where the silver lining is for President Obama, I have to        say I cannot see one,” says Bill Galston, a former Clinton official, who        has been predicting for months the Democrats could lose the House. “Just        as BP’s failure to cap the well has been so damaging, Obama’s failure to        cap unemployment will be his undoing. There is nothing he can do to        affect the jobless rate before November.”              The direction of the data could hardly be worse. According to Democracy        Corps, a group headed by Stanley Greenberg, a liberal pollster who is a        close friend of Rahm Emanuel, Mr Obama’s chief of staff, a majority of        US citizens see Mr Obama as “too liberal”.               Astonishingly, 55 per cent of citizens think Mr Obama is a “socialist”        against only 39 per cent who do not share that diagnosis. The same poll        shows 48 per cent support for Republicans against just 42 per cent for        Democrats. The numbers are eerily similar to 2006, except that it was        George W. Bush’s Republicans who were on the receiving end four years        ago.               “The bottom line here is that Americans don’t believe in President        Obama’s leadership,” says Rob Shapiro, another former Clinton official        and a supporter of Mr Obama. “He has to find some way between now and        November of demonstrating that he is a leader who can command confidence        and, short of a 9/11 event or an Oklahoma City bombing, I can’t think of        how he could do that.”               In private, informal advisors to Mr Obama are almost as negative.        According to one, the US public’s loss of confidence in Mr Obama’s        leadership is a factor above and beyond their dissatisfaction over the        state of the real economy, which continues to slow as last year’s $787bn        stimulus starts to run dry. The adviser, who asked to remain anonymous,        said the public did not know what Mr Obama really believed. Examples        include his lukewarm support last year for a public option in the        healthcare bill and his equally lukewarm support today for a Senate bill        that would extend unemployment insurance and aid state governments to        keep teachers in their jobs.               In both cases, Mr Obama has offered only token, negotiable, support. “I        never thought I would say this, but even I’m unsure what President Obama        really believes,” says the adviser. “Instead of outsourcing decisions to        Congress, he should spell out his bottom line. That is what leaders are        for.”               Next week, Mr Obama is likely to sign a historic Wall Street re-       regulation bill into law. Earlier this year he did the same for        healthcare. But polls show the public either does not care, or even        opposes these otherwise big reforms. “The longer this goes on, the more        it looks like Obama wasted his first year on healthcare,” said the        outside adviser. “It’s still the economy, stupid.”       Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2010. You may share using our        article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by        email or post to the web.              --- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10        * Origin: (1:226/600)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca