Hi Marc,   
      
   >  regarding follow-up on: NCs who've updated to MakeNl_NG >   
      
   >> I'm in much the same position as an RC.  If I don't happen to receive   
   >> a weekly update from an NC, I have to presume the previous segment   
   >> from that system is correct and valid... within limits of course.   
      
   >> I am working on raising that age limit now.  Would the 7 weeks that   
   >> NLMake uses be sufficient for your purposes?    I am also looking   
   >> into the problem you reported with the OS/2 32-bit version, but   
   >> that may take some time to track down.   
      
   >The program has no business whatsoever omitting data because of age. Absolutel   
   > unacceptable.   
      
   I agree... nothing should be removed by MakeNl.   
      
   >And the version of NLMake I've been using has no problem with   
   > the age of files in the Master directory.  The only thing the program should   
   > look at is the most recent file and disregard the rest.   
      
   Agree here as well.   
      
   Take care,   
   Janis   
      
   --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1   
    * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)