Hello Andrew.   
      
      
      
    ML> I'm in much the same position as an RC.  If I don't happen to receive   
    ML> a weekly update from an NC, I have to presume the previous segment   
    ML> from that system is correct and valid... within limits of course.   
      
    AL> I am working on raising that age limit now.  Would the 7 weeks that   
    AL> NLMake uses be sufficient for your purposes?    I am also looking   
    AL> into the problem you reported with the OS/2 32-bit version, but   
    AL> that may take some time to track down.   
      
   The program has no business whatsoever omitting data because of age.   
   Absolutely unacceptable.  And the version of NLMake I've been using has no   
   problem with the age of files in the Master directory.  The only thing the   
   program should look at is the most recent file and disregard the rest.   
      
   Best regards,   
   Marc   
      
   --- timEd/2 1.10.y2k+   
    * Origin: Sursum Corda! BBS-Huntsville,AL-bbs.sursum-corda.com (1:396/45)