Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    MAKENL_NG    |    MakeNL Next Generation.    |    1,725 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 582 of 1,725    |
|    Wilfred van Velzen to Andrew Leary    |
|    Re: follow-up on: NCs who've updated to     |
|    25 Jan 13 12:11:11    |
      Hi Andrew,              On 25 Jan 13 10:04, Ward Dossche wrote to Andrew Leary:        about: "Re: follow-up on: NCs who've updated to MakeNl_NG":               AL>> I am working on raising that age limit now. Would the 7 weeks that        AL>> NLMake uses be sufficient for your purposes? I am also looking        AL>> into        AL>> the problem you reported with the OS/2 32-bit version, but that may        AL>> take some time to track down.               WD> I've got a valid segment that is over a year old ...              I use makenl_ng on linux to compile the AmigaNet nodelist. I have a segment       that is 5 years old (and yes it's still valid and up to date ;)).              Btw: I never noticed that makenl_ng didn't accept a segment because of it's       date stamp. I'm currently using 3.2.9b. Is this a recent change?              I think you should make the age limit check optional and the period       configurable (or remove it all together)...              Wilfred.              --- FMail-W32-1.65-B20130103        * Origin: point@work (2:280/464.112)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca