home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   MAKENL_NG      MakeNL Next Generation.      1,725 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 582 of 1,725   
   Wilfred van Velzen to Andrew Leary   
   Re: follow-up on: NCs who've updated to    
   25 Jan 13 12:11:11   
   
   Hi Andrew,   
      
   On 25 Jan 13 10:04, Ward Dossche wrote to Andrew Leary:   
     about: "Re: follow-up on: NCs who've updated to MakeNl_NG":   
      
    AL>> I am working on raising that age limit now.  Would the 7 weeks that   
    AL>> NLMake uses be sufficient for your purposes?    I am also looking   
    AL>> into   
    AL>> the problem you reported with the OS/2 32-bit version, but that may   
    AL>> take some time to track down.   
      
    WD> I've got a valid segment that is over a year old ...   
      
   I use makenl_ng on linux to compile the AmigaNet nodelist. I have a segment   
   that is 5 years old (and yes it's still valid and up to date ;)).   
      
   Btw: I never noticed that makenl_ng didn't accept a segment because of it's   
   date stamp. I'm currently using 3.2.9b. Is this a recent change?   
      
   I think you should make the age limit check optional and the period   
   configurable (or remove it all together)...   
      
   Wilfred.   
      
   --- FMail-W32-1.65-B20130103   
    * Origin:  point@work  (2:280/464.112)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca