Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    MAKENL_NG    |    MakeNL Next Generation.    |    1,725 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 566 of 1,725    |
|    mark lewis to Marc Lewis    |
|    follow-up on: NCs who've updated to Make    |
|    22 Jan 13 05:54:17    |
       MarcL> Important to note here - it's NOT the file date that MakeNL is         MarcL> looking at, it's the julian extension which it apparently         MarcL> calculates on the fly based on the system date/time as to which         MarcL> extensions are acceptable.              ahh! that makes a difference, then... my configs do not use julian dated       extensions... i know about them and could use them but for security reasons,       do not... this also prevents the creation of netseg diffs but that's never       been a problem...               MarcL> Here's what I'm talking about from the debug log. This example         MarcL> is for Net 117 where the [latest] file I have on hand has         MarcL> extension ".323":               [trim debug log]              interesting...               MarcL> And ZAP, Net 117 disappears from the compilation, along with         MarcL> all the others that are older than MakeNL thinks they should         MarcL> be.         MarcL> Faulty logic, Mr. Spock.               gotta wonder how/when that snuck in... i'll have to see if i can find some       time to test with the original makenl 2.5x binaries i have here... although i       do recall seeing notations from those makenl binaries about not finding files       newer than 3 weeks old... but again, i've never run makenl using the julian       dat extensions... it sounds like an easy fix, though, if that's all it is...               MarcL> And I still haven't heard back from Andrew. :(              yeah, i wrote his a few netmails about some aspects of the merge code and the       generated .999 files and haven't heard back, either... but i'm not too worried       about my reports... they're more visual which is how i noticed them but they       shouldn't affect the actual use and processing of the .999 files...              )\/(ark              ---         * Origin: (1:3634/12.42)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca