ml> or perhaps you misunderstood me? bj”rn's patched makenl (2.51??)    
    ml> already allowed this years ago when he let it out for everyone to    
    ml> use... automatically and no config verbs or similar...   
      
    BF>    Thanks mark, you are absolutely right.   
      
   you are welcome, bj”rn ;)   
      
    BF> If every *C had used my patched version already from the Y2K    
    BF> change-over, we wouldn't have to debate this issue now.   
      
   yeah, and 12 years later, no less :/   
      
    BF>    And what encoding to use? Who cares? Just let the fucking 128+    
    BF> characters pass, and let the users decide how to handle them! If    
    BF> you cannot see them as they were intended -- big deal. They would    
    BF> at least be more meaningful, than the present question marks, to    
    BF> many enough users.   
      
   exactly what i was trying to say :)   
      
   )\/(ark   
      
   ---    
    * Origin:  (1:3634/12.42)