BF> If you had rather used my Y2K patched version (where the outdated 26   
   BF> character limitation was one of corrections I made), available for more   
   BF> than 12 years now, 2:203/6 would read correctly. After all, that's the   
   BF> version I've been using to create my segments for all those years...   
       
   Have you ever offered it to me or made its existance known?   
       
   At the moment I use 3.3.0, I think we're now talking different worlds.   
       
   I live by what the programmers can provide me. For example, I now understand   
   the case why not to auto-add a variable comment-line based on the software's   
   name/date/version and will live with that.   
       
   As for the correctness of one's name ... for the better part of the past month   
   my name from my birth certificate was in the nodelist ... no-one seems to have   
   noticed it, it generated not a single comment/message/spark.   
       
   So ... ??   
       
    \%/@rd    
      
   --- D'Bridge 3.9   
    * Origin: Many Glacier / Protect - Preserve - Conserve (2:292/854)