Hello Andrew!   
      
   03 Jan 13 21:24, you wrote to Ward Dossche:   
      
    WD>> How difficult/desirable would it be for makenl to add a comment-entry   
    WD>> either all the way at the begining or at the end indicating the   
    WD>> version-number/compile-date of the makenl which was used to create a   
    WD>> particular nodelist?   
      
    AL> It should not be terribly difficult to add this, if we get sufficient   
    AL> requests for it.   
      
    As there is only one line that is not in the chechsum, and that line is   
    fully used, it would be impossible to create an identical file on a   
    different system. It may sound as a bonus, but not when you are testing   
    a new release.   
      
    If you decide to exclude more lines from the checksum, all nodediff   
    procressors and whatever check are used downstream will have to be   
    adapted.   
      
    Just my two cents.   
      
   Kees   
      
   --- FPD v2.9.040207  GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5   
    * Origin: My views are moderated by a virtual Penguin (2:280/5003.4)