home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   MAKENL_NG      MakeNL Next Generation.      1,725 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 258 of 1,725   
   Janis Kracht to mark lewis   
   Error in the Region 17 / Net 153 segmmen   
   04 Nov 12 16:21:18   
   
   >> Had the host segment been processed, by a current makenl, then DOWN   
   >> would have been converted to "Down" and the line a valid entry.   
      
   >> No, the line in question is not a valid entry, as the standards are   
   >> currently documented.   
      
   > isn't that an ugly oversight?? most *C's will simply alter the existing line   
   > and add or change the first field without editing the rest of the line...   
   > "Down" should be allowed with "-Unpublished-" as "Hold" and "Pvt" are...   
      
   >then there's the problem of coding to the specs when the program being coded i   
   >the one that sets the specs which are then documented by a completly different   
   >body that has nothing to do with the program... so i say that makenl-ng should   
   >not "code to the specs" in this particular case but it should allow "Down" wit   
   > "-Unpublished-" and let the specs catch up... that'll fix that...   
      
   > now, with all that said... i just tested using the following versions of   
   >makenl... the numbers in parenthesis are the actual file dates of the binary o   
   > the disk...   
      
   > MakeNL -- Version 2.51 -- Jun 14 1992 16:55:25 (28 Nov 1999 y2k patch)   
   > MakeNL -- Version 2.51 -- Jun 14 1992 16:55:25 (16 Jun 1992)   
   > MakeNL -- Version 2.50 -- Feb 11 1991 11:54:28 (12 Feb 1991)   
      
   >all of them *DO* allow "Down" with "-Unpublished-"... no bitchin', gripin', or   
   >complainin'... i manually checked the output file and they were all exactly th   
   > same... this indicates a problem with the current code that needs to be fixed   
   > so as to conform to the old version(s)... that takes case of one problem...   
      
   Seems that way to me, Mark.   
      
   > this also indicates that something is not right with the specs... at least in   
   > this particular case anyway... this needs to be brought up "over there" and   
   > fixed as well...   
      
   Take care,   
   Janis   
      
   --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1   
    * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca