Hi,   
      
   On 23 Oct 12 12:23, andrew clarke wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:   
     about: "CVS Updates":   
      
    WvV>> (It should be Git updates, but:) Yes.   
      
    ac> I can't imagine why you'd want to move such a small project to Git.   
      
   The size doesn't matter. ;)   
      
   If two (or more) people in different places use a VCS, a Distributed VCS has a   
   lot of advantages. (And I just prefer git over the others like bzr or hg,   
   which I have tried)   
      
    ac> I'd suggest Subversion at a stretch, if only because it gives you a   
    ac> couple of useful features that CVS is sorely lacking, notably the   
    ac> ability to rename a file in the repo without losing the commit log.   
      
    ac> But CVS is fine.   
      
   Today I worked a bit with TortoiseCVS to get the makenl sources and view it's   
   history and diffs, and I already hate it! TortoiseGIT (or even TortoiseSVN)   
   works and looks so much better...   
      
   Bye, Wilfred.   
      
      
   --- FMail-W32-1.64-B20111120   
    * Origin: Amiga Offline BBS Lisse (2:280/464)