On Sun 2012-10-14 09:26, Rj Clay (1:120/419) wrote to andrew clarke:   
      
    RC>   I've also thought about that, and for both successful and   
    RC> unsuccessful test runs (like testing with and without the    
    RC> 'Allowunpub' keyword).   
      
   Sounds good.   
      
    RC>   'Course, then there's the issue of how to name them and where   
    RC> to keep them.    
      
   Probably just 001.ctl, 002.ctl, etc. in a directory named 'test' in the CVS   
   tree.   
      
   The first few lines of the CTL file would be comments describing the test.   
      
   I was going to suggest that tests could possibly be combined, although (1) I'm   
   not sure this is needed, (2) it could get quite complicated to trace what   
   tests are being performed & (3) it looks like the CTL file doesn't have an   
   INCLUDE command anyway. So, probably best to run each test individually.   
      
   A makefile in the test directory would allow each test to be run   
   independently, or all tests at once just by running 'make'.   
      
   --- timEd/FreeBSD 1.11.b8   
    * Origin: Blizzard of Ozz, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (3:633/267)