home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   MAKENL_NG      MakeNL Next Generation.      1,725 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,569 of 1,725   
   Kees van Eeten to mark lewis   
   killsent attribute   
   29 Oct 18 12:27:04   
   
   Hello mark!   
      
   28 Oct 18 12:52, you wrote to me:   
      
    KE>> For a long term solution, convince Andrew to move the definition of   
    KE>> the attribute to the ctl file. But expect the answer that is was not   
    KE>> needed in the last 25 or so years.   
      
    ml> while i understand, it apparently has been needed... else why would we   
    ml> have these?   
      
    ml>   submit     x:y/z INTL   
    ml>   notify     errors INTL CRASH   
    ml>   notify     receipt INTL   
    ml>   notify     self INTL   
      
    You are diverting my words, I was talking about the kill sent bit not the   
    mechanism of send or not sending messages.   
      
    ml> if someone wanted killsent then we could have something like this...   
      
    ml>   submit     x:y/z INTL KILLSENT   
    ml>   notify     errors INTL CRASH PVT   
    ml>   notify     errors INTL DIRECT IMMEDIATE PVT   
    ml>   notify     receipt INTL KILLSENT   
    ml>   notify     self INTL KILLSENT   
      
    ml> in other words, turn killsent off by default and specify it if you want   
    ml> it... maybe LOCAL should be the only forced attribute and all the others   
    ml> added as above...   
      
    Your suggestion of implementation, would be correct if this would be built   
    in from the start. Now however it would change the default behaviour of   
    makenl.   
      
    The new features that have been added to makenl, have all been implemented   
    in such a way, that when they are not added to the control file, makenl   
    will ignore the feature and behave as it has always has done.   
      
    Ik my opinion that is a golden rule that should be adhered to.   
      
    ml> i don't know about others but i /want/ to see those emails that were   
    ml> generated... i can delete or archive them later...   
      
    You may put any emphasis on what YOU want, but that should not lead to   
    having all other users of makenl to suddenly have their messagebase clogged   
    with messages, that were automatically remove as long as makenl exists.   
      
    And ALL except you have to change their control files to get back to the   
    how makenl used to work.   
      
   Kees   
      
   --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5   
    * Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5003.4)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca