Hello Kees,   
      
   On Thursday November 03 2016 22:30, you wrote to Andrew Leary:   
      
    KE>>>  I have had a "look" at 3.4.6, not tested it jet. What I   
    KE>>> gathered from the docomentation and the source code, is that a   
    KE>>> BOM from submitted fts5 lines will be removed, but the   
    KE>>> copyright, prolog and epilog are untouched. Shouldn't the BOM be   
    KE>>> removed from these files as well?   
      
    AL>> Good point.  I'll have to add scanning for BOMs in those files as   
    AL>> well.   
      
   Indeed, good point, never thought of testing the prolog/epilog..   
      
    KE>  There were no problems there. The REMoveBOM flag was enabled, but   
    KE> ofcourse there were no BOM's in the input files. I will leave the   
    KE> creation of files with BOM markers to Michiel.   
      
   See boms.zip in your inbound.   
      
    KE> He uses a MS-editor, that adds such usefull information.   
      
   Not really. The editor I normally use does not add boms. I had to revert to   
   some trickery to add boms for testing.   
      
      
   Cheers, Michiel   
      
   --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20130111   
    * Origin: http://www.vlist.eu (2:280/5555)