Re: Processing nodelists with UTF?   
     By: Roy Witt to Nicholas Boel on Mon Jan 23 2012 07:12 am   
      
    > I'm afraid this one went over your head. I replied to Janis that I do have   
    > more than one echomail feed.   
      
   As do I. It might not be as many as you have, but I do know how to keep them   
   separated all in the same.   
      
    > It wasn't an insult, Nick. It just meant that having several sources of   
    > echomail feeds is probably over your head. That concept will come to you   
    > with some experience.   
      
   I already have two. At the moment I haven't needed any more than that, but   
   that's always up for reconsideration. :)   
      
    > Yes. It doesn't include several echomail feeds...   
      
   But it does include more than one.   
      
    > Then if you're familiar with FE, you should be able to figure out the   
    > multi-echomail feed concept. I've used several other mail tossers and   
    > always go back to what works best.   
      
   Yep. I know the concept FE uses, as I've used it before. Nowadays, on Linux, I   
   just edit an areas.bbs and put the node number of my uplink next to the echo   
   tag, and any downlinks listed after that. Fairly easy. Then netmail is a   
   different configuration file. with a simple ROUTE_TO statement.   
      
   I had no complaints about Fastecho when I used it. It worked the way it was   
   supposed to. :)   
      
   --   
   Nick aka axisd - telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org   
                    http://pharcyde.org   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux   
    * Origin: thePharcyde_ telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)