Re: Makenl and bad segments...   
     By: Bj”rn Felten to Joe Delahaye on Sat Jan 03 2015 17:48:37   
      
    WD>>> * If something is being done all over zone-2 then it is relevant   
      
    JD>> It is still ONLY Z2 and not the other 3 zones.   
      
    BF> Irrelevant. What's relevant is that it's actually something that can be   
    BF> put into a technical definition file.   
      
   Why.  The FTSC documents general practice.  If it is only done in one zone, it   
   is not general practice.     
      
      
    BF> As I said before, if Ward had put it into writing and submitted it to   
    BF> the FTSC, it would have been judged by it's merits. Not that I think it   
    BF> would have any real value to add to our FTN -- but at least he could have   
    BF> given it a try. We've seen far more queer proposals during the decades...   
    BF> 8-)   
      
   Perhaps, but again, General practice, is what is supposed to be looked at.  The   
   fact that several stupid things were done previously does not mean that   
   something that might make a little more sense, should be accepted, just   
   because.   
   --- SBBSecho 2.27-Win32   
    * Origin: The Lions Den BBS, Trenton, On, CDN (1:249/303)