On Fri, 02 Jan 2015, Kees van Eeten wrote to Benny Pedersen:   
      
    KvE>  The general reaction to inclusion is, that a higher level C   
    KvE> should not make  any changes to the segments offered for   
    KvE> inclusion.   
      
    KvE>  In a way this makes sense. The lower level C knows, that he   
    KvE> submits a segment  with errors, or ignores the results of the   
    KvE> testrun, that is available to him.    
      
   errrmmm... there are/were many *Cs that manually maintained their segments in   
   a plain old text editor with no assistance from any software... there is no   
   guarrantee that they had any sort of ""testrun"" or "validation" of their   
   segment other than that returned by the next *C up the chain... those *Cs   
   should be able to edit the submitted segment to fix it so as to ensure that   
   the net or region covered by the broken segment is not left out of their   
   segment being passed on upstream...   
      
   let's not fall into the fallacy that everyone can even run makenl or any other   
   nodelist tool or that they even have the desire to do so...   
      
   )\/(ark   
      
    * Origin:  (1:3634/12)