Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    MAKENL_NG    |    MakeNL Next Generation.    |    1,725 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,201 of 1,725    |
|    Kees van Eeten to Björn Felten    |
|    The seven-bit restriction    |
|    03 Feb 14 19:55:44    |
      Hello Björn!              03 Feb 14 18:59, you wrote to me:               BF> Usually known as the ASCII characters higher than 0x7f.               There are no ASCII characters higher as 0x7f. The 8th bit depended on the        parity sceme used.               KvE>> Because there is no consensus on what is to be represented by these        KvE>> so called high-ASCII.               BF> No need to. Every region (outside of Z1 and Z3) -- meaning parts of the        BF> world using completely different languages -- takes care of it's own. The        BF> rest can simply either ignore it or take the recent technical developments        BF> and handle it accordingly.               Apparently they do.               BF>>> many years now, and I'm still just Bj?rn in the nodelist there... :(               KvE>> It is not the magic on how it is to be done.               BF> No magic needed. My 15yo Y2K patch can handle it.               Your patch can only be used on an obsolete OS.               BF> Maybe you haven't have time to read my recent comments yet? What I'm        BF> asking is, why this option is even needed. And if it is, why is the        BF> default to have it disabled and not vice versa?               I have read a lot of comments and I have engaged in discussions on this        subject, maybe not in echo's that you read, but still.               KvE>> you have written there is no single way to write Bj?rn.               BF> But there is! *I* write it the way I want it. In my Region20 file it's        BF> written the way I want it. That's simply the way *I* want it. Freedom of        BF> expression, anyone...?               Well so what is your problem? You have it your way where you decide,        others have it their way where they decide. I can assure you that the        nodelist looks very different, where I decide.               Have you ever looked at the distribution list compiled by Z3, it has been        totally different for many years.               KvE>> But I am still curious, what definition of high-ASCII will be used?               BF> None at all. If we regard the nodelist as the simple, binary file that        BF> it was intended to be from the very beginning, we can put whatever        BF> characters that we want in there.               It has never been a binary file and during the time I have been in Fidonet,        it was never intended to be a binary file. It is a structured file and that        brings limitations. You must always consider that there is 15 old software        that has to parse the file. Using 2 byte characters could confuse the parser.              Kees              --- FPD v2.9.040207 GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5        * Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5003.4)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca