Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    MAKENL_NG    |    MakeNL Next Generation.    |    1,725 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,105 of 1,725    |
|    Janis Kracht to Ulrich Schroeter    |
|    MakeNL v3.4.1 Release    |
|    03 Jan 14 13:42:30    |
      Hi Uli!              >>>> What has happened is known, it crashes the OS/2 systems of 'top'       >>>> *Cs...              >>> MakeNL never crashed anyone's system, OS/2 or otherwise. There was       >>> a bug in MakeNL OS/2 versions before 3.4.0 that caused the program       >>> to crash. This bug has been fixed.              >>> Discussions are underway on dealing with Marc's other issue with       >>> MakeNL; he feels that there should not be an age limit on segments.              >> Definitely.. there shouldn't be anything to do with age limits in the       >> program..              >> Even though you tell me there are age limits in the Linux version, I       >> have yet to see that, and I have seen RCs here who do not submit       >> updates in well over 6 weeks :)              > there are some hidden facts with makenl processing ...              > there exist 2 different methods in picking up or calculating segment files.              > In the example Ward posted a few mails before, he uses              > region20.*              > definition in the control file, so makenl no longer calculates any daynumber       > schema and uses any file that matches the filemask region20.*              Ah.. makes sense, Uli. Thank you for your note.              > Otherwise the definition in the makenl.control file has to be       > region20 -or-       > region20.       > to use the 7 days daynumbering schema upcoming friday -> 003,       > one week ago -> 361,       > 2 weeks ago -> 354       > and so on              Ok, I can see that now.              > daynumbers out of this sequence will be ignored completely :-P       > so a daynumber 362 will not picked up (eg while sending an update to       > regionxx.361 where the filename regionxx.361 is still in the inbound       > and the mailer increments the extension by 1 -> this makes .362                     >> When I run the nodelist on thursday night, the existing segments (no       >> matter what their current extentions, like *361, are "almost" always       >> renamed to the julian week number for the Thursday night nodelist like       >> *.003.              >and yes, once a segement is found in the search routine that matches the stric       > numbering schema, the filename extension will be renamed to current extension       > and will be updated in each subsequent processing.       > So once a segment has been found, its still in the subsequent continous       > processings                     >> There also some hanger's around which carry previous week's       >> julian dates.. If I had my druthers. every segmemt in the master       >> directory would get updated to the Julian date of the thursday night       >> julian date... I have copies of the original segments I have to check       >> the datestamp..              Thanks again, Uli :)              Take care,       Janis              --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1        * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca