Hi Andrew,   
      
   Sunday August 25 2013 16:01, you wrote to me:   
      
    ac> 24 Aug 13 23:18, you wrote to me:   
    US>> than it is in sync, as I've unpacked the tarball downloaded as   
    US>> http://makenl.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/makenl/?view=tar   
    US>> and used it for compile in a plain version control system free   
    US>> directory the only difference was the make file that doesn't work   
    US>> with the long filename for the .watcom so I have to customize   
    US>> this makefile so it works under 8.3 filename convention, copied   
    US>> over the makefile   
    ac> Renaming it to makefile.wat should work.   
      
   from a long series of trial and errors to get watcom to compile under os/2 and   
   to use the correct libs and includes paths, I had a customized makefile   
   that I've copied over from revision to revision compile   
      
   so that I've extracted the tarball and copied over the customized make file.   
   the last time I've started the os/2 watcom compiler is about 4 weeks ?!?   
   old so I don't remind all the details, that I've used in this project   
   to get the compile running ... especialy with the debugging / non debugging ...   
   don't expected that the makefile did change ... copied over ...   
   compile ... fail .. problem identified ... the pat* thingee ...   
      
   while comparing both files on another machine, after your reply, I've found   
   that there is not much difference in the makefile except the pat*   
      
   but this does nothing have to do with rest of the files from the tarball.   
      
   I cannot get the files from the cvs you're pushing to sourceforge, I can only   
   download the tarball from sourceforge, and I have no idea, if the tarball   
   content is identical to the cvs raw content you're pushing to   
   as said .. download is possible for comparison by git, http, ftp .. so in this   
   section is the tarball is included ... but cvs isn't possible   
      
   is someone other able to compare the cvs content with the tarball   
   that is presented on the sourceforge website under makenl_ng ?!?   
      
    ac> I did not anticipate anyone still using FAT filesystem under OS/2 in   
    ac> 2013.   
      
   wrong assumption ...   
      
   lfn disabled on a mounted netdrive for longtime fallback compatibily reasons   
   in a mixed environment   
      
      
    ac> I have no more free time this week to look for the bug, so you'll   
    ac> have   
    ac> to investigate it yourself.   
    ac>   
    ac> The changes I made were fairly minimal, but it's possible patmat()   
    ac> isn't working as expected.   
      
   sounds that the tarball is identical to your cvs pushed directory   
   as the tarball includes the patmat.c/patmat.h and the modified makefile   
      
   so the reported problems processing segments stands :-P   
   as the compile didn't reported an error ...   
      
      
    ac> -$- GoldED+/BSD 1.1.5-b20110223-b20110223   
    ac>  $ Origin: Blizzard of Ozz, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (3:633/267)   
      
   regards, uli   ;-)   
      
   ---   
    * Origin: AMBROSIA - Frankfurt/Main - Germany (2:244/1120)