Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    LS_ARRL    |    Bulletins from the ARRL    |    3,036 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 92 of 3,036    |
|    Bulletin autopost to All    |
|    ARLP045    |
|    13 Nov 10 00:41:52    |
      SB PROP @ ARL $ARLP045       ARLP045 Propagation de K7RA              ZCZC AP45       QST de W1AW        Propagation Forecast Bulletin 45 ARLP045       From Tad Cook, K7RA       Seattle, WA November 12, 2010       To all radio amateurs               SB PROP ARL ARLP045       ARLP045 Propagation de K7RA              Average daily sunspot numbers and solar flux increased over the past       week, with sunspot numbers up 7.4 points to 33.1 and solar flux up       2.1 points to 84.2. Four new sunspot groups appeared since November       4. For some reason NOAA is currently showing a sunspot number of       zero for Thursday, November 11, yet there are spots visible. In       fact, the total sunspot area increased by 57% from November 10 to       11, and the sunspot number on November 10 was 55. On early Friday       morning a peek at http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/ftpdir/indices/DSD.txt       shows the zero sunspot number for yesterday, but perhaps by the time       you read this, it will be corrected.              The latest forecast shows predicted solar flux at 85 on November       12-13, 84 on November 14-15, and 83 on November 16-18. Predicted       planetary index for November 12-21 is 10, 10, 8, 8, 7, 5, 5, 20, 15       and 10.              Last year Steve Nichols, G0KYA wrote the bulletin for us on October       30, 2009, and he has just published a free online book with G3NYK.       The title is "Understanding LF and HF Propagation," and you can       download it from Steve's blog at http://www.g0kya.blogspot.com/.              Don Kalinowski, NJ2E sent a link to a blog on the Aviation Week and       Space Technology web site about a new international initiative to       work on space weather issues. You can read it at       http://snipurl.com/1ftp42. In the article is a link to a series       from NASA explaining space weather. See it at       http://tinyurl.com/2ak5g9f.              We got mail about ARRL CW Sweepstakes last weekend. Don Lynch,       W4ZYT of Virginia Beach, Virginia wrote, "We operated from the Outer       Banks of North Carolina, and did well on 15 through 80 meters. We       did not operate 160, and found 10 meters so unproductive that we       made no contacts there. 15 was surprisingly good during the day and       more productive than I expected.              "I found all the bands were long - I was working west coast stations       on 80 meters at 0600 UTC, and on 40, could easily work W6 and W7 and       KH6 stations, but had trouble connecting with New England and       Florida.              "Our group worked the VY1 as our first QSO and then missed the sweep       because of Nebraska."              Paul Mackanos, K2DB wrote, "I started out on 40 and it was the best       start we ever had at K2NNY. Band was great, we ran 40 then went to       80 and had the same conditions, GREAT, everything went well, super       rates, etc, until daylight on Sunday, then everything seemed to die       down.              "We could never get anything going on Sunday. Just limped along,       maybe we worked everyone over night on 80!"              Jim Jordan, K4QPL wrote, "I thought propagation was very 'normal'       for the time of year, with 80M on the East Coast being better than       average. This was my first time QRP so I was a bit more sensitive       to 'softness' in prop. Really don't have time or memory to give a       blow by blow hourly report.              "80M- No weird going long as it sometimes does in winter and I heard       happened earlier in the week. On the other hand, with the storms       having moved out, QRN was low so weaker stations not masked in       noise. QRP was good for the entire east coast and to the Rockies and       I got several 'FB QRP SIG' comments. Antenna is an inverted V with       apex at about 60'. Occasional QSOs with west coast but generally       with the stations known to have good antennas and 'ears.'              "40M- For some reason 40 is never my best band despite it being a       'money band' for others. It performed about at par with a bit more       range into the west than 80 as the skip lengthened. But for sheer       numbers, 80 still came in better for me.              "20M also performed pretty much as expected. Good transcontinental       prop to help me fill in western and Canadian mults and S&P (search       and pounce) the ones I couldn't work on 80. Went long enough to also       get KH6 and KL7 mults. Hard to hold a run frequency there except way       high in the band.              "15M was surprisingly good and exhibited a lot of normal 20M       characteristics. As I only have a tribander for 10-15-20 I sometimes       put my second radio with a 40M dipole on 15 while running 20 and it       seemed to do as well as the tribander if not better for S&P. Maybe       the higher angle was getting more refraction in target areas when       the band was perhaps actually longer. 15 also did well as a primary       band for a short time but didn't generate the same volume for me.       Tried a couple runs with both antennas but didn't seem to support       QRP very well.              "10M- Never went there. Flipped the Orion II to 10 every now and       then on Sunday afternoon and could tell from the display nothing was       happening."              Ted Saba, KN5O who operated W5RU wrote, "From W5-land near New       Orleans, we found 80M to be in great shape. In fact, we made nearly       as many Qs on 80 as we did on 40M. (I use a 40M moxon at 86ft and a       phased pair of 1/4-wave verticals on 80). 80 was good all over,       very low QRN. We may have benefited more by moving to 80 sooner       than we did.              "Looking at the log, by the time we switched from 20m to 40m, 40 had       gone long. Normally we can work the close in sections, NFL, WCF,       SFL, AL and sometimes MS/AR with relative ease. Not so this year.       Skip zone had to be a good 700+ miles from us.              "20m was its usual crowded self - it is where we normally start and       can run for about 3-4 hours, we did so this year as usual. I found       20m typical.              "15m is terrible for us. 1st skip zone is about 1300+ miles I would       guess. Only good for AK, PAC, WA, OR, CA, AZ and a few Canadian       provinces - VY1, VY0, BC, AB and SK. Occasionally we would hear the       far NE, but not consistently."              Tim Prosser, KT8K wrote, "20m and 40m went long fairly early, but       noise levels were fortunately fairly low on 80m at my location (SE       Mich) - about S7 on my Orion. My K9AY loop (with new termination       resistor) did a fantastic job of reducing that to S1 while signals       only dropped to S5-7 - much easier on the ears.              "Propagation on 40m was a bit spotty, and was better as always while       I was in the gray line zone.              "80m was great and I got great signal reports from my 5 Watts and       wires in the trees as far away as Hawaii and LAX."              Connie Marshall, K5CM wrote, "Conditions were good in general, but       better the first day. Being in the center of the USA has both       advantage and disadvantages. It's an advantage on 80 meters where       conditions were very good Saturday night (the largest number of Qs       came on 80 with 538). It's a disadvantage on 15m, where skip was       just too long to work anything but the very edges of the East and       West coast and mainly just the West. Was hoping for a little Es to       help prop on 15 and 10 meters, but no luck this year. It's still a       little early for the winter time Es season, which as you know,       usually peaks in Dec/Jan. 40 meters was good with East coast       stations being heard in the middle of the day. We probably should       have spent more time on 40. 20 meter prop was good but very       crowded, especially at the beginning of the contest. We still had a       good contest, setting a new Multi-op CW-SS record for Oklahoma."              Bob Norin, W7YAQ wrote, "I had not been on the air for two months       preceding the SS. But managed to put in the full 24 hours in the CW       SS. Running QRP, and having a 3-el SteppIR for 20-10, I was hoping       for a nice 10 meter opening, and evening openings on 20. QRP on the       low bands is not always a lot of fun.              "Here are my observations by band:              "10 meters: [3-el SteppIR at 70'] We had an opening Sunday morning       from Central Oregon to the east coast. Signals were very good, but       there just wasn't much activity. Between 1724 and 1814 UTC I worked       11 stations in MAR, QC, ON, ENY, WNY, MDC, EPA, VA, TN, and GA.              "15 meters: [3-el SteppIR at 70'] Generally good conditions, better       than 2009 and 2008.              "20 meters: [3-el SteppIR at 70'] Band closed at sunset both days.       No short skip to BC/AB/WA/CA/ID/MT/NV this year.              "40 meters: [SteppIR trombone dipole at 70'] Good conditions       Saturday evening. Seemed to close shortly after sunset Sunday.       (Maybe everybody just went to 80)              "80 meters: [Inv vee at 65'] Seemed in great shape with signals       booming in from all over NA. Made some east coast QSOs late       Saturday night. Running QRP, however, I would prefer the loud       signals to only be from the western NA, as can distinguish which       ones I can work better. If I were running 100 watts, I would have       loved 80 this weekend!              "I have operated the last 3 SS contests QRP and with same antennas."              Stu Mitchell, W7IY of Stafford, Virginia wrote, "I operated       unassisted QRP from VA again this year at W4NF's station. The bands       seemed in pretty good shape and matched the VOACAP predictions. I       started on 20M and had no problem working CA, WA and OR. Although,       20M seemed pretty quiet before the contest. It was hard to tell if       the solar activity was the culprit or people were just getting in a       last minute nap. 20M closed around night fall, so I moved to 40M.       Nothing unusual there, but it seemed like there were fewer people to       work. The band was quiet with no QSB.              "During the evening, I spent the vast majority of my time on 80M,       routinely checking 40M. Hawaii (0600Z on 40M) appeared on time and       was easy to work. No QRN or QSB on both bands. If a station was over       S5, I was able to work them without any problem at all. I was able       to run several times with good results.              "I experienced the typical doldrums during the day on the higher       bands. 15M opened for a bit to the TX, NM and CA. My first 15M QSO       was at 1542Z and my last was at 1755Z. I worked Alaska at 1700Z on       15M. No QSB on either 15 or 20. 10M never opened for me.              "Through the second diurnal shift, I made my way back to 80M through       40M. 40M seemed much quieter during the last few hours of the       contest, although I kept sweeping the band with my second radio       looking for ID. Finally, at 0139Z, I came across K0TO on 80M and       completed Worked All States. Didn't get a clean sweep. Missed MB,       NL, NWT. I heard MB and NWT, but the pileups were too big for my QRP       station."              Tim Kresky, AB0S wrote, "From Kansas, 20m, 40m, and 80m were good.       Very little noise on the low bands. 10m was dead. 15m had some       activity, but not enough for us to spend any useful time there. I       suspect the skip was such on 15m that the coasts had a great time       talking to each other, but it was just a little too long for us to       hear most stations."              If you would like to make a comment or have a tip for our readers,       email the author at, k7ra@arrl.net.              For more information concerning radio propagation, see the ARRL       Technical Information Service web page at       http://arrl.org/propagation-of-rf-signals. For an explanation of the       numbers used in this bulletin, see       http://arrl.org/the-sun-the-earth-the-ionosphere. An archive of past       propagation bulletins is at       http://arrl.org/w1aw-bulletins-archive-propagation. Find more good       information and tutorials on propagation at       http://mysite.ncnetwork.net/k9la/index.html.              Monthly propagation charts between four USA regions and twelve       overseas locations are at http://arrl.org/propagation.              Instructions for starting or ending email distribution of ARRL       bulletins are at http://arrl.org/bulletins.              Sunspot numbers for November 4 through 10 were 34, 29, 43, 34, 36,       35, and 55, with a mean of 33.1. 10.7 cm flux was 79.2, 83, 88.6,       85, 83.7, 84.1 and 85.6 with a mean of 84.2. Estimated planetary A       indices were 3, 2, 1, 1, 3, 3 and 4 with a mean of 2.4. Estimated       mid-latitude A indices were 2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1 and 3 with a mean of       1.7.       NNNN       /EX              ---        ========              IF you have questions or concerns regarding the accuracy       of information posted, or the opinions expressed, contact the content       originators directly. All publications retransmitted as       fidonet echomail without alteration other than the removal of       email header and other control information which       is not part of the actual publication.              We invite you to use and support the ham-fdn!       The ham-fdn is coordinated by Mark LEwis at fidonet 1:3634/12. Contact him       for further       information about ham-fdn file echoes. Announcements of newly       hatched ham-fdn files can be seen in the echoes ham and ham_tech.              THe ham-fdn is distributed by the International FIlegate project.       Ham-fdn file echoes are available from major hubs. Bbs users with an       interest in these file echoes should ask your sysop to carry them.              Users and sysops with materials appropriate for distribution       via the ham-fdn should contact the coordinator for submission       guidelines at the above shown address. IF you have access to       shareware programs that would be useful to radio amateurs,       or other files which may be appropriate use the back channel       area to submit them. IF you are not sure how to accomplish this       contact the fdn coordinator, or ask your local bbs sysop.                     ---        * Origin: RRN BBS: Your fidonet ham radio connection! (1:116/901)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca