home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   LS_ARRL      Bulletins from the ARRL      3,036 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 674 of 3,036   
   Bulletin autopost to All   
   ARLP018   
   04 May 12 20:37:40   
   
   SB PROP @ ARL $ARLP018   
   ARLP018 Propagation de K7RA   
      
   ZCZC AP18   
   QST de W1AW     
   Propagation Forecast Bulletin 18  ARLP018   
   From Tad Cook, K7RA   
   Seattle, WA  May 4, 2012   
   To all radio amateurs    
      
   SB PROP ARL ARLP018   
   ARLP018 Propagation de K7RA   
      
   Average daily sunspot numbers declined 38 points to 106.7 this week,   
   and average daily solar flux declined nearly 18 points to 116.2.   
      
   Predicted solar flux is 115 for May 4-6, 110 on May 7-10, 120 on May   
   11, 130 on May 12, 135 on May 13, 140 on May 14-17, 135 on May   
   18-21, and 130, 125, 120, 115, 110 on May 22-26 and 105 on May   
   27-31.   
      
   Predicted planetary A index is 5 on May 4-8, then 10, 10 and 8 on   
   May 9-11, 5 on May 12-13, 8 on May 14-15, then 5, 8, 5, 8, and 10 on   
   May 16-20, 15 on May 21-23, 8 on May 24, 5 on May 25 through June 4,   
   followed by 15 on June 5-6.   
      
   The NASA solar cycle prediction from the Marshall Space Flight   
   Center at http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/predict.shtml changed   
   over the past month.  The predicted maximum smoothed international   
   sunspot number declined slightly from 61 to 60, but still is   
   predicted for Spring 2013. The date of the new prediction is May 1,   
   2012 and last month's was on April 2, 2012. International sunspot   
   numbers have much lower values than the sunspot numbers we use in   
   this bulletin.   
      
   Sunspot numbers have generally declined from a peak during Fall   
   2011.  We look at a 3-month moving average every month, and now that   
   we know the numbers for all of February through April, we know the   
   average sunspot number centered on March, which is 71.2. The 3-month   
   moving sunspot number averages centered on January, 2011 through   
   March 2012 are 35.3, 55.7, 72.3, 74.4, 65.9, 61.5, 63, 79.6, 98.6,   
   118.8, 118.6, 110, 83.3, 73.7 and 71.2. The three month moving   
   average smooths out the numbers so we can see a steady downward   
   trend since October and November 2011, when the numbers were 118.8   
   and 118.6.   
      
   But looking at the monthly averages, we can see a recent uptick. The   
   monthly average sunspot numbers for October 2011 through April 2012   
   are 123.6, 133.1, 106.4, 91.4, 50.1, 78 and 84.5.  Note that the   
   average sunspot number for the past week - 106.7 - is higher than   
   any monthly average since December 2011.   
      
   Interesting article out of Cornell University, "The Science Behind   
   Solar Storms." Read it at,   
   http://www.cornellsun.com/section/science/content/2012/05/02/sci   
   nce-behind-sola   
   r-storms.   
      
   Jim Spears, N1NK of Tiverton, Rhode Island, Roger Larson, KF6IVA of   
   Harrison, Maine, Paul Dluehosh, N4PD of Leesburg, Virginia, Bruce   
   Clark, K0YW of Ignacio, Colorado and Jon Jones, N0JK of Lawrence,   
   Kansas all pointed out that the abbreviation NF that was referenced   
   in the last bulletin, Propagation Forecast Bulletin ARLP017, refers   
   to Noise Figure, not Noise Floor.   
      
   N0JK sent this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noise_figure.   
      
   K0YW offered the following comments about noise figure and   
   preamplifiers:   
      
   "At 6 Meters and below the employment of a preamp ahead of most   
   modern transceivers is not likely to result in any noticeable   
   improvement, as the ambient thermal noise from the earth and sky   
   background is high enough to readily overcome the sensitivity   
   threshold of the existing receiver's RF stage/s, especially if the   
   myriads of local man made noise sources are added in. It is this   
   combination of factors that will establish the 'Noise Floor' that   
   the radio sees. Even if the receiver's sensitivity is improved by   
   lowering its noise figure - either at the receiver or with an   
   external antenna mounted preamp - it will not generally improve   
   performance vs. weak signals at or under the existing noise floor.   
   Such preamps do a good job of making that noise louder along with   
   the weak signal, resulting in no real S/N improvement. Depending on   
   its gain it can also seriously degrade the receiver's dynamic range,   
   increasing the likelihood of overload or cross modulation   
   interference from strong, close-by stations that are off frequency.   
      
   "Preamps become effective if receive feedline loss is excessive, or   
   if the receiver noise figure is poor. This condition is very rare at   
   HF and 6 meters. It usually becomes a factor at frequencies in the   
   UHF region and higher, especially where extreme feedline lengths or   
   lossy coaxial feedlines are used. Every dB of feedline loss will be   
   seen as an extra dB increase in the receiver's noise figure. While   
   this is a serious consideration at 432, 1296 and higher, it is of   
   little concern at HF and 6 Meters where preamplifier equipped   
   transceivers achieve noise figures in the 4-8 dB region. At 6   
   meters, these noise figures are very adequate to hear the weakest   
   signals.  Good feedline, like LMR series, waterproof versions of   
   9913 or 1/2 inch Heliax on short runs of less than 150 ft are a lot   
   cheaper way to optimize performance on 6M than an expensive antenna   
   mounted preamp."   
      
   Rich Zwirko, K1HTV sent in the following propagation report:   
      
   "The HF bands were in pretty good shape when the 7O6T DXpedition to   
   Yemen showed up on April 30 at 2104Z with an S9+ signal on 15   
   meters. I was 7O6T's second 15 meter CW QSO, easily working them   
   simplex with my barefoot K3 and 3 element tribander. They quickly   
   went split and as soon as a DX Cluster post was made, the expected   
   huge pileup began. In the next few days I managed to work 7O6T on   
   both CW and SSB on 20, 17 and 15 meters. We had an interesting late   
   afternoon East Coast opening to the Yemen DXpedition on May 2. I   
   contacted 7O6T at 2124z (that's 0024 local Yemen Time) on 12 meter   
   SSB, again with 100 Watts, using a wire antenna.   
      
   "Six meter Es openings on the afternoon of May 2 provided FL31 and   
   FL32 water grids to a number of stations up and down the East coast.   
   I worked UT1FG/MM, operating maritime mobile southeast of the   
   Bahamas, on 50.110 MHz. Yuri is captain of the cargo ship Mottler.   
   With his 100 Watts and dipole he has been having fun with E-skip,   
   providing a number of new grids to ops on the Magic Band."   
      
   If you would like to make a comment or have a tip for our readers,   
   email the author at, k7ra@arrl.net.   
      
   For more information concerning radio propagation, see the ARRL   
   Technical Information Service web page at   
   http://arrl.org/propagation-of-rf-signals. For an explanation of the   
   numbers used in this bulletin, see   
   http://arrl.org/the-sun-the-earth-the-ionosphere. An archive of past   
   propagation bulletins is at   
   http://arrl.org/w1aw-bulletins-archive-propagation. Find more good   
   information and tutorials on propagation at   
   http://myplace.frontier.com/~k9la/.   
      
   Monthly propagation charts between four USA regions and twelve   
   overseas locations are at http://arrl.org/propagation.   
      
   Instructions for starting or ending email distribution of ARRL   
   bulletins are at http://arrl.org/bulletins.   
      
   Sunspot numbers for April 26 through May 2 were 117, 99, 118, 114,   
   104, 99, and 96, with a mean of 106.7. 10.7 cm flux was 119.2,   
   117.9, 121.1, 116, 114.1, 109.9 and 115.5, with a mean of 116.2.   
   Estimated planetary A indices were 17, 8, 5, 5, 3, 4, and 5, with a   
   mean of 6.7. Estimated mid-latitude A indices were 17, 7, 5, 5, 2,   
   3, and 4, with a mean of 6.1.   
   NNNN   
   /EX   
      
   ---   
                                   ========   
      
   IF you have questions or concerns regarding the accuracy   
   of information posted, or the opinions expressed, contact the content   
   originators directly.   All publications retransmitted as   
   fidonet echomail without alteration other than the removal of   
   email header and other control information which   
   is not part of the actual publication.   
      
   Improve your skills as an emergency communications volunteer.   
   CHeck out EMCOMM MONTHLY.  Visit   
   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca