Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    LS_ARRL    |    Bulletins from the ARRL    |    3,036 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 2,333 of 3,036    |
|    mark lewis to all    |
|    ARLB037 Current Rules Holding Hams Back     |
|    14 Oct 16 06:03:26    |
      SB QST @ ARL $ARLB037       ARLB037 Current Rules Holding Hams Back from Adopting State-of-the-Art       Technology, ARRL Says              ZCZC AG37       QST de W1AW       ARRL Bulletin 37 ARLB037       > From ARRL Headquarters       Newington CT October 12, 2016       To all radio amateurs              SB QST ARL ARLB037       ARLB037 Current Rules Holding Hams Back from Adopting State-of-the-Art       Technology, ARRL Says              In comments filed on October 12 with the FCC, ARRL reiterated its case that       the FCC should impose a 2.8 kHz limit on symbol rate for digital modes,       arguing that its approach is both balanced and necessary. ARRL had asked the       FCC to change the Part 97 rules to delete the symbol rate limits in Part       97.307(f) and replace them with a maximum bandwidth for data emissions of 2.8       kHz on amateur       frequencies below 29.7 MHz. In a July Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) in       WT Docket 16-239, the FCC proposed to eliminate the current baud rate       limitations for data emissions, consistent with       ARRL's Petition, but it declined to propose a bandwidth limitation for data       emissions in the MF and HF bands to replace the baud rate limitations.              ARRL's comments can be found on in PDF format on the web at, htt       s://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1011120327463/Comments%20of%20ARRL%20on       20NPRM%2010112016%20FINAL.pdf .              ARRL told the FCC in its comments that the current HF symbol rate "speed       limit" reflects 1980s technology and has no place in an experimental radio       service in which modern protocols could be efficiently deployed in crowded       RTTY/data subbands.              "The symbol rate limit was created in order to maximize the efficient use and       reuse of that crowded, shared spectrum, but the assumptions made at the time       are no longer valid," ARRL said, "and the rules now prohibit radio amateurs       from utilizing state-of-the-art technology, thus precluding or substantially       inhibiting any meaningful contribution to the advancement of the radio art in       this area." ARRL said earlier assumptions are no longer valid mainly because       there is no correlation between the data rate and the occupied bandwidth in       the rules now.              The League said present rules in the HF data subbands promote inefficiency,       allowing data transmissions of unlimited bandwidth as long as the symbol rate       is sufficiently low, and it stressed that       there must be some limit on occupied bandwidth for HF data emissions.              "Eliminating the symbol rate limitations for data emissions and substituting a       maximum authorized bandwidth would permit the utilization of all HF data       transmission protocols presently legal in the Amateur Radio Service, as well       as state-of-the-art protocols that fall within the authorized bandwidth," the       League said.              ARRL said that it could be "fairly debated" whether or not 2.8 kHz is the       proper maximum bandwidth for data emissions. "Greater bandwidth for data       emissions would permit a wider array of data emissions now and in the future,"       the League said in its comments. "However, even 2.8 kHz could arguably permit       usurpation of the subbands to the detriment of CW and other narrow-bandwidth       emissions. ARRL views the 2.8 kHz maximum bandwidth proposal for data       emissions at HF to be a necessary component of the FCC's proposal, and it       fairly balances the objectives of facilitating use of new and future data       emissions and protecting against usurpation of the band by a few data stations.              ARRL said it would be impossible to reduce the permitted maximum bandwidth for       data emissions at HF much below 2.8 kHz without prohibiting data modes that       are now legal. "At the same time, it would not be desirable to have a few data       stations using large swaths of spectrum to the detriment of other modes," the       League said.              The deadline to file reply comments in the proceeding - ie, comments on       comments already filed - is November 10.              NNNN       /EX              )\/(ark              Always Mount a Scratch Monkey       Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer doin' it       wrong...       ... We fall in love with a personality but we must live with a character.       ---        * Origin: (1:3634/12.73)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca