SB QST @ ARL $ARLB022   
   ARLB022 FCC's OET Clarifies Emissions Compliance Testing for RF LED Lighting   
   Devices   
      
   ZCZC AG22   
   QST de W1AW   
   ARRL Bulletin 22  ARLB022   
   > From ARRL Headquarters   
   Newington CT  June 30, 2016   
   To all radio amateurs   
      
   SB QST ARL ARLB022   
   ARLB022 FCC's OET Clarifies Emissions Compliance Testing for RF LED Lighting   
   Devices   
      
   The FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) has clarified that all RF   
   LED lighting devices falling under Part 15 rules as "unintentional radiators"   
   must meet conducted and radiated emissions limits set forth in those rules.   
      
   "Operation of Part 15 unintentional radiators is subject to the condition that   
   no harmful interference is caused," the OET reminded, in a knowledge database   
   paper released on June 17. "Manufacturers and users should therefore note that   
   lighting devices are required to cease operation, if harmful interference   
   occurs."   
      
   The OET said radiated emissions measurements must be performed at least from   
   30 MHz to 1000 MHz to adequately demonstrate compliance with Part 15 (15.109).   
   Its guidance, the OET continued, applies to RF LED lighting devices that, in   
   the past, have been considered to operate on frequencies below 1.705 MHz.   
   Previously, devices operating between 9 kHz and 1705 kHz had to be tested only   
   for radiated emissions up to 30 MHz, where no specified radiated emissions   
   limits exist, and were exempt from testing from 30 MHz to 1000 MHz. The OET   
   said it recognizes that routine radiated emissions measurements are needed   
   under Part 15, based on the highest frequency generated or used in the device.   
      
   "[W]e have found that emissions from RF LED lighting devices are non-periodic,   
   broadband in nature, and are produced as a byproduct of the internal driver   
   circuitry within the RF LED lighting device," the OET "knowledge database"   
   paper said. "These types of emissions have adequate energy and potential to   
   generate radiated emissions well above 30 MHz."   
      
   The ARRL Lab's Electromagnetic Compatibility Engineer Mike Gruber, W1MG, said   
   he was pleased to see the FCC's OET clarify the test measurement requirements.   
   He said ARRL is generally hearing more RFI complaints stemming from RF LED   
   bulbs.   
      
   "Not only are the emissions limits higher for Part 15 LED bulbs - as opposed   
   to Part 18 fluorescent and CFL bulbs, they seem to be winning out in terms of   
   consumer popularity," Gruber said. "Higher limits and more bulbs probably make   
   for more complaints." Gruber said the Lab has seen LED lighting devices   
   causing problems in the 2 meter band. "Since conducted emissions limits do not   
   apply above 30 MHz, radiated emissions limits can be the first line of defense   
   against RFI at these higher frequencies."   
      
   Gruber pointed out that noise generated by street and traffic lighting can be   
   widespread. In such instances, he suggested that Part 15b limits for   
   residential areas should apply. "These limits are lower than Part 15a limits,   
   which are intended only for commercial and industrial environments," he   
   explained. "This is especially critical in cases where a pole transformer   
   connected to the lighting device also feeds a home or residence. The 240 V   
   split-phase secondary system can conduct RF into a residence through the   
   service entrance panel." He suggested that the lower limits may benefit mobile   
   users.   
      
   The OET noted that the ANSI Accredited Standards Committee C63-EMC is drafting   
   measurement procedures for lighting devices. "When complete, we expect it will   
   address in greater detail the measurement procedures and configurations to be   
   used in determining compliance," the OET said.   
      
   NNNN   
   /EX   
      
   )\/(ark   
      
   Always Mount a Scratch Monkey   
      
   ... You WHAT?! You told my wife I said I was in total control.   
   ---   
    * Origin:  (1:3634/12.73)