Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    LS_ARRL    |    Bulletins from the ARRL    |    3,036 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,703 of 3,036    |
|    mark lewis to all    |
|    ARLP004 Propagation de K7RA    |
|    28 Jan 15 20:24:36    |
      SB PROP @ ARL $ARLP004       ARLP004 Propagation de K7RA              ZCZC AP04       QST de W1AW        Propagation Forecast Bulletin 4 ARLP004       >From Tad Cook, K7RA       Seattle, WA January 23, 2015       To all radio amateurs               SB PROP ARL ARLP004       ARLP004 Propagation de K7RA              Average daily sunspot numbers for January 15-21 dropped 50.7 points       relative to the previous seven days, to 61.9. Average daily solar       flux declined from 151.3 to 126.2. For the past ten days sunspot       numbers have remained below 100. This benchmark has no special       significance, but the last time there were this many consecutive       days with double-digit sunspot numbers was October 5-20, 2014.              Geomagnetic numbers indicated more stable conditions, with average       daily planetary A index declining from 9.6 to 6.4, and average daily       mid-latitude A index dropping from 8 to 4.7.              The latest prediction from USAF/NOAA has solar flux at 130 and 135       on January 23-24, 130 on January 25-26, 135, 140 and 145 on January       27-29, 135 on January 30 through February 1, 130 on February 2-3,       125 on February 4-6, 130 on February 7-9, 125 on February 10-11 and       120 on February 12-13. Solar flux reaches a low of 115 on February       18, and peaks again at 135 on February 26-28.              Predicted planetary A index is 15 on January 23-24, 18 on January       25-26, 8 on January 27-28, 12 on January 29-30, 15 on January 31       through February 1, then 12, 15, 12 and 5 on February 2-5, 10 on       February 6-7, 8 on February 8-9, 5 on February 10-12, then 8, 5 and       12 on February 13-15, 10 on February 16-18, and 8 on February 19-20.              F.K. Janda, OK1HH predicts geomagnetic activity will be active to       disturbed on January 23, quiet on January 24, mostly quiet January       25, active to disturbed January 26-28, quiet January 29, active to       disturbed January 30, mostly quiet January 31, disturbed February       1-2, quiet to unsettled January 3, quiet to active January 4, active       to disturbed February 5, quiet to active February 6-8, mostly quiet       February 9-13, quiet to active February 14, and quiet to unsettled       February 15-17.              Randy Crews, W7TJ of Spokane, Washington posted these observations:              "Thanks for the link and update from NASA in your last bulletin. A       couple things I wanted to add to amplify on the trend and outline a       unique historical perspective.              "Cycle 24's peak is past and will fall into the ranks of the lower       Sunspot Cycles 10, 12, 13, 14, and 16. NASA's article pointed out       Cycle 24 being the smallest since Cycle 14 in 1906. It will probably       mirror Cycle 12 or 13 finishing with a smoothed sunspot number in       the high 70s low 80s plus or minus. A few additional points make       this cycle unique in addition to the second peak being higher than       the first: In past strong sunspot cycles (21, 22, and 23) we have       had what I would call the 'top 3' being 3 outstanding years of high       solar activity (the year prior to the peak, the year of the peak,       and the year after where Solar flux values have averaged between 150       and 225).              "Tying this observation to Cycle 23 (a lower but normal cycle in       2000, 2001, and 2002) during these peak years propagation on 10, 12,       and 15 meters was outstanding almost ALL the time. Cycle 24 has       bestowed just a little over one year of this type of propagation -       late 2013 to present. Graphically seen from the Solar activity       report from this Web link:              "http://www.solen.info/solar/images/comparison_recent_cycles.png              "Things become more interesting with the fact Cycle 24 will       obviously finish with a smoothed sunspot number of less than 100.              "This is the first time this has occurred since Cycle 16 finished in       1933 (over 80 years ago!).              "Link with the corresponding data:              "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_solar_cycles.png              "Graphically, Cycle 24 will fit into the BIG picture as follows,       accurately done by K9LA:              "http://k9la.us/A_Look_at_All_Twenty_Three_Solar_Cycles.pdf              "Connecting the dots from the graphs, historically there have been       decades of high and low solar activity spanning several sunspot       cycles. As one source has pointed out, got most of our radio amateur       lifetimes we have experienced some of the highest solar activity       periods in history, 1950 to 2009. The Graph from NASA of the current       trend pretty well sums up the overall direction:              "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle_24#mediaviewer/File:Ha       haway_Cycle_24 _Prediction.png              "Summarizing:              "Cycle 24 will be a low cycle very likely to be followed by several       other low or even lower cycles - supported by the current and       historical data. Make the most of the current band conditions and       upcoming DXpeditions - it certainly looks as if we are heading       toward a 'Propagation Winter.'"              Thanks, Randy.              I do not know if we are headed toward a "propagation winter" and       quiet Sun or not, although plenty of experts much smarter than me       might think so. I like to remember when some of the best minds made       a case for the upcoming Cycle 24 to be the biggest ever, and of       course it did not turn out that way.              I hope to be around for the next cycle, might even see the one after       that, but I doubt I will see three cycles out. When I started as a       Novice it was Cycle 20, right after the big one, and it sure seemed       weak!              We heard from Rich Zwirko, K1HTV of Amissville, Virginia. He wrote:              "Other than a few Es openings, 6 meters has been pretty quiet the       past few weeks. I think that we have seen the last of any 50 MHz E-W       F2 skip for this solar cycle and possibly future cycles. Magic       Banders will have to rely on summer multi-hop E-skip and SSSP       chordal openings for the next long haul 6 Meter DX contacts."              He also mentioned that his son, Andy, K1RA of Warrenton, Virginia is       operating a RaspberryPi as a multi-band HF WSPR beacon running only       10 milliwatts. (RaspberryPi is a tiny and inexpensive computer that       is popular as a microcontroller. See http://www.raspberrypi.org/ )              This not only changes bands automatically according to a timing       cycle, but the microprocessor actually generates the RF and connects       directly to the antenna feedline, via some simple filtering. The       signal is output as a square wave, but the harmonics are easy to       filter out and at 10 mw are simple to control. The beacon callsign       is KW4VA and the grid locator is FM18cr.              Andy wrote:              "I've been running a Raspberry Pi and the JamesP6000 WSPRryPi code       under my club call KW4VA recently, which you can read about at the       following URL for info, links and DX spot maps:              "http://www.k1ra.us/2015/01/03/kw4va-wspr-beacon              "In short the RPi CPU can natively generate about 10 milliwatts of       RF from 0-250 MHz off one of its GPIO pins. The WSPR code is based       off some earlier code developed in the UK to allow generation of FM       signal at 100 MHz:              "http://www.icrobotics.co.uk/wiki/index.php/Turning_the_Raspberr       _Pi_Into_an_FM _Transmitter              "I'm running one of the IO pins to external wire antennas. I was       stuck at about 7500 km for a few years until this past week when I       was spotted by ZS6AF on 17m at 13322 km, then in the last two days       by ZL1RS on 20m at 13811 km and finally VK2DDI on 30m at 15729 km.       Here are the spots from the WSPR propagation database:              "Timestamp MHz SNR Reporter RGrid km              2015-01-19 08:22 10.140240 -27 VK2DDI QF55hf 15729        2015-01-15 10:18 14.097116 -24 ZL1RS RF64vs 13811        2015-01-08 21:14 18.106032 -22 ZS6AF KG54mk 13322              "I've been playing with very low power WSPR for a while now. In the       past I'd been using a PIC controller by AA0ZZ and a 0-60 MHz DDS       board by N2APB that also put out about 10 mw and was using a 30m       dipole in the attic at 30'. Then I was stuck on one band at a time,       usually 10m. I'm sure the outside dipoles and wires at 45' help a       bit. With the use of the RPi though I've have been able to       automatically band hop. I think this too has helped to increase my       DX spots by other WSPR stations. I run 80, 40, 30, 20m every 2 mins       at night and 20, 17, 15, 12 10m every 2 mins during the day."              This weekend are the ARRL January VHF Contest (see       http://www.arrl.org/news/the-arrl-january-vhf-contest-offers-a-b       eak-from-winte r-s-doldrums       and http://www.arrl.org/january-vhf) and the CQ World Wide 160 meter       CW Contest (http://www.cq160.com/rules.htm).              For the 160 meter CW contest we would like to see very quiet       geomagnetic conditions. OK1HH predicts disturbed conditions on       Friday, then quiet on Saturday and mostly quiet Sunday. Quiet is a       good outlook, although I don't know what the effect of Friday's       conditions might be on the rest of the weekend if they are       disturbed.              NOAA/USAF predicts an A index of 15 on Friday and Saturday and 18 on       Sunday. This is neither quiet nor disturbed, but I would       characterize it as unsettled conditions.              Let's hope for dead quiet geomagnetic conditions over the entire       weekend. Have fun!              Following up on last week's link to an article about the National       Radio Quiet Zone and the people who flock there, N7SO sent another       article:              http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2013/04/gr       en_bank_w_v_wh ere_the_electrosensitive_can_escape_the_modern_world.single.html              We also heard from a ham who used to work there, Rob Welsh, N3RW,       who wrote:              "I was previously employed at NRAO Green Bank (see       http://www.nrao.edu/) on a Milky Way mapping project. Given that       NRAO GB is in the National Radio Quiet Zone, I was given permission       to put my QRP rig on the air on 17 meters using the HF Bruce array       at the observatory entrance. Few stations I worked believed that I       was running just 5 W. With about 100 feet of RG-58 between the dorm       and the antenna, I bet I was radiating more like 3 W at best."              Info on a Bruce Arrays:              http://rudys.typepad.com/ant/files/antenna_array_80160m.pdf              Rob also wrote in a subsequent email:              "The Bruce Array at the entrance to the Green Bank site is a rebuild       of the antenna used by physicist Karl Jansky who in the 1930s       studied radio noise for the Bell System's HF radio circuits.              "Jansky eliminated all noise sources except one which occurred 4       minutes earlier each day. In conversations with others, he was told       that the stars rise 4 minutes earlier than solar time.              "Jansky may have been the first to discover galactic radio noise as       he was recording the radio noise emitted by the Milky Way.              "One of my tasks while employed at GB was to perform a VSWR vs.       frequency plot of the Bruce Array. The center frequency, as I       remember, was about 20 MHz, so with a QRP antenna tuner I was able       to find a match for the 17 meter band.              "Radio astronomers consider the HF bands as 'low frequency' for       astronomical observations. There has been an increase in HF       observations at HF with the purpose of identifying galactic sources       at lower energy levels.              "Also at the entrance to the site is a rebuild of Grote Reber's       (W9GFZ, SK) 30 foot parabolic antenna. Reber read Jansky's published       work and went about measuring galactic radio noise at VHF.              "See my article in the December 2009 issue of QST titled 'How the       Ionosphere Was Discovered.'              "The callsign, W9GFZ, has been issued to NRAO and used at both the       Green Bank site and at the Very Large Array in New Mexico. I've       observed at both sites.              "You may see the antenna systems at GB by using: www.gb.nrao.edu       and on the left side of the main page, surf to 'telescopes.' My QSL       card has the 45 foot antenna on the front. That is the system I used       to map a quadrant of our galaxy at wavelengths of 3.5 and 2.1 cm.       Big antennas sure are interesting!"              If you would like to make a comment or have a tip for our readers,       email the author at, k7ra@arrl.net.              For more information concerning radio propagation, see the ARRL       Technical Information Service web page at       http://arrl.org/propagation-of-rf-signals. For an explanation of the       numbers used in this bulletin, see       http://arrl.org/the-sun-the-earth-the-ionosphere. An archive of past       propagation bulletins is at       http://arrl.org/w1aw-bulletins-archive-propagation. More good       information and tutorials on propagation are at http://k9la.us/.              Monthly propagation charts between four USA regions and twelve       overseas locations are at http://arrl.org/propagation.              Instructions for starting or ending email distribution of ARRL       bulletins are at http://arrl.org/bulletins.              Sunspot numbers for January 15 through 21 were 62, 75, 49, 78, 62,       57, and 50, with a mean of 61.9. 10.7 cm flux was 131.4, 124.7,       121.9, 125.8, 130, 125.6, and 123.9, with a mean of 126.2. Estimated       planetary A indices were 6, 7, 7, 5, 5, 4, and 11, with a mean of       6.4. Estimated mid-latitude A indices were 5, 6, 5, 3, 2, 5, and 7,       with a mean of 4.7.       NNNN       /EX                      )\/(ark              If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until       you hire an amateur.              --- FMail/Win32 1.60        * Origin: (1:3634/12.71)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca