home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   LIVE_AUDIO      Sound reinforcement tools & techniques      99 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 76 of 99   
   Richard Webb to Marc Lewis   
   digital snakes, possibly redux   
   10 Sep 12 18:49:50   
   
   HI Marc,   
      
   On Mon 2012-Sep-10 12:32, Marc Lewis (1:396/3) wrote to All:   
      
   ML> I did a little exploring again during my lunch break. I went to the   
   ML> Beringer web site and saw their S16 digital snake. It said the   
   ML> following in regards to "stand alone" mode - i.e. Analog console:    
      
   ML> CUT   
      
   ML> Although the S16 was initially designed for use with our flagship   
   ML> X32 digital console, any mixing board with AES50 networking   
   ML> capability can tap into the S16's powerful feature set. So if you   
   ML> happen to work on an analog mixing board occasionally, you could use   
   ML> two pairs of S16 and ADA8000 to form a high-performance, lightweight   
   ML> 16 x 16 digital snake, all on one CAT5 connection, keeping the   
   ML> preamp remote control functionality.   
      
   SOunds interesting, i might just explore that!  Small rack   
   to sit on splitter rack with these would be just waht the   
   doctor ordered for use with my mci.  That would also fit   
   well if I decided to go Yamaha, or  Behringer for   
   another digital console in the truck.  I've enough   
   connections for a second console, which has often been done   
   in the life of this truck, and already know that when second large format   
   console is added to truck it's gonna be a digi, so far I've been leaning   
   Yamaha, but this would play well   
   with my existing system.  Looks like i need to call my   
   favorite friendly Behringer dealer on this one.  Their   
   ada8000 is already part of my ops for less than truck gigs.   
   This would play rather well within my existing workflow.   
   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca