Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    LINUX    |    Torvalds farts & fans know what he ate    |    8,232 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 7,196 of 8,232    |
|    Dan Clough to Richard Falken    |
|    Re: MX Linux    |
|    23 Jul 21 07:47:00    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 1396.fido_linux@1:123/115 255ff9ff       REPLY: 1393.fido_linux@1:123/115 255fbb61       PID: Synchronet 3.19a-Linux master/48598fc02 Jun 13 2021 GCC 5.5.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Linux master/48598fc02 Jun 13 2021 GCC 5.5.0       BBSID: PALANT       CHRS: ASCII 1       -=> Richard Falken wrote to Dan Clough <=-               > Anybody used this MX Linux distro for much of anything?        >        > Been toying around with a few distros lately and this one has caught my        > eye. It's another Debian-based with ties to AntiX and Mepis. Seems        > pretty well done compared to others I've seen, and the real bonus is        > that it doesn't use 'systemd'.        >        > So just wondering if anyone has used it for a while, and what you may        > think of it... Thanks for input.               RF> I have some MX Linux DVDs that came with Linux Magazine and have        RF> used them as last resort / emergency installs for workstations at        RF> work.               RF> I think it ships with systemd by default, though. I think it is        RF> just not enabled.              I does ship/install with systemd, but as you said it is not enabled by        default, and is not running. Close enough for me.               RF> MX Linux is good for eye candy but I personally don't think it        RF> makes sense to install it if you have a Devuan DVD available. I        RF> think you don't gain much by moving from Debian/Devuan to MX        RF> Linux but you are placing yourself further downstream which is        RF> always problematic.              I have been a little less than impressed with Devuan. Not sure it's        completely "finished" just yet. I'm not even normally a Debian user,        although I do like many things about it. As far as moving downstream...        using that logic we should all be using Slackware. ;-) (which I am).               RF> So well, it works more often than not, but it does not bring        RF> anything new to the table. You can do much worse than installing        RF> MX Linux, certainly.              Agreed. As I continue to get tired of waiting for Slackware to catch        up, I am just pondering some possible replacement options. In reality I        will probably never move off of Slack, but I like to think that I        could... ;-)                            ... Everybody should believe in something: I believe I'll have another drink.       === MultiMail/Linux v0.52       --- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux        * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:123/115)       SEEN-BY: 1/120 123 14/0 18/0 90/1 105/81 114/709 116/116 120/340 457       SEEN-BY: 120/616 123/0 10 25 35 40 115 126 131 150 160 170 180 190       SEEN-BY: 123/200 257 755 129/305 135/300 153/757 7001 7715 154/10       SEEN-BY: 154/30 40 50 700 203/0 220/80 90 221/0 1 6 226/18 30 227/114       SEEN-BY: 227/201 702 229/101 310 424 426 428 452 550 616 700 1016       SEEN-BY: 229/1017 240/5832 249/206 317 400 261/38 280/464 282/1038       SEEN-BY: 292/854 299/6 301/1 317/3 322/757 335/364 342/200 460/58       SEEN-BY: 460/256 777 1124 5858 633/0 267 280 281 384 410 412 414 416       SEEN-BY: 633/509 640/1138 1321 1384 712/848 770/1 3634/0 12 15 27       SEEN-BY: 3634/50 119 4500/1 5054/30       PATH: 123/115 3634/12 154/10 221/6 460/58 640/1384 633/280 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca