REPLY: 2:230/0 5f7c7bc2   
   MSGID: 2:240/77 5f7ce03b   
   CHRS: LATIN-1 2   
   TID: hpt/lnx 1.4.0-sta 09-04-05   
   Hello Benny!   
      
   06 Oct 20, Benny Pedersen wrote to Kai Richter:   
      
    KR>> HTML will need multiple bytes to define a symbol.   
      
    BP> same as unicode when its 8 bit charters   
      
   You got the point. You will have multibytes in unicode and multibytes plus   
   html around it.   
      
    BP> programmers dont understand double encodeing problems   
      
   You can't blame a standard for that. There will be programmers that don't   
   understand html too.   
      
    KR>> the software must know which symbol have to be displayed for that   
    KR> KR>> multibyte sequence.   
      
    BP> and unicode solve that much better then html, hmm   
      
   I never said that. You must have the multibyte sequence to define the symbol.   
   Why adding memory space and cpu requiring htmltags around it? I don't see the   
   advantage.   
      
   Regards   
      
   Kai   
      
   --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.4.7   
    * Origin:  Monobox  (2:240/77)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 120/340 123/131 226/30 227/114 702 229/101 424   
   SEEN-BY: 229/426 452 550 616 664 1016 240/77 5138 5411 5832 5853 249/206   
   SEEN-BY: 249/317 400 280/464 292/854 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757   
   SEEN-BY: 342/200 633/280 2432/390 2452/250 2454/119   
   PATH: 240/77 5832 229/426