TZUTC: -0800   
   MSGID: 47704.linux@1:103/705 22c2b174   
   REPLY: 2:280/464.113 5e5be628   
   PID: Synchronet 3.17c-Win32  Mar  1 2020 MSC 1924   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.10-Linux r3.151 Mar  1 2020 GCC 6.3.0   
   COLS: 80   
   CHRS: CP437 2   
   NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.103   
     Re: life ?   
     By: Maurice Kinal to Rob Swindell on Sun Mar 01 2020 04:43 pm   
      
    > Hallo Rob!   
    >   
    >  RS> Java?   
    >   
    > Yes.  I believe java was the language that originally prompted this   
    > discussion ...   
      
   You're saying Java doesn't have a foreseeable future?   
      
    > or was it clang vs gcc?  I forget now.   
      
   Um... clang and gcc aren't programming languages.   
      
    >  RS> don't always "eat their own dog food"   
    >   
    > That can happen.  Speaking for myself I don't knowingly consume any java   
    > products to honour the fallen.  As of this writing everything here requires   
    > gcc including llvm (clang) and the only reason for llvm has to do with xorg   
    > and absolutely zero to do with the console thank goodness.  However I still   
    > plan to try recompiling glibc with clang when llvm-10 becomes official which   
    > should be very soon.  I am just a tad too curious about the claim of a clang   
    > based OS, which from the angle looks to be highly suspicious thus far.  I   
    > have yet to see any real evidence.  How about you?   
      
   I'm not really sure what you're talking about. You seem to be saying that that   
   llvm (clang) requires gcc? I don't know how to digest that bit of info.    
      
                                               digital man   
      
   This Is Spinal Tap quote #17:   
   David St. Hubbins: It's such a fine line between stupid, and uh... and clever.   
   Norco, CA WX: 47.1øF, 89.0% humidity, 0 mph WSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs   
   --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux   
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 103/705 154/10 203/0 218/700 221/0 227/114 229/101   
   SEEN-BY: 229/426 452 616 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003   
   SEEN-BY: 288/100 292/854 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/120   
   SEEN-BY: 633/280 712/848 770/1 2452/250 5020/545   
   PATH: 103/705 280/464 229/426