REPLY: 47700.linux@1:103/705 22c13c67   
   MSGID: 2:280/464.113 5e5be628   
   CHRS: UTF-8 4   
   Hallo Rob!   
      
    RS> Java?   
      
   Yes.  I believe java was the language that originally prompted this discussion   
   ... or was it clang vs gcc?  I forget now.   
      
    RS> don't always "eat their own dog food"   
      
   That can happen.  Speaking for myself I don't knowingly consume any java   
   products to honour the fallen.  As of this writing everything here requires   
   gcc including llvm (clang) and the only reason for llvm has to do with xorg   
   and absolutely zero to do with the console thank goodness.  However I still   
   plan to try recompiling glibc with clang when llvm-10 becomes official which   
   should be very soon.  I am just a tad too curious about the claim of a clang   
   based OS, which from the angle looks to be highly suspicious thus far.  I have   
   yet to see any real evidence.  How about you?   
      
   Het leven is goed,   
   Maurice   
      
   ... Huil niet om mij, ik heb vi.   
   --- GNU bash, version 5.0.11(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)   
    * Origin: Little Mikey's EuroPoint - Ladysmith BC, Canada (2:280/464.113)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 103/705 154/10 203/0 221/0 227/114 229/101 426   
   SEEN-BY: 229/452 616 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 288/100   
   SEEN-BY: 292/854 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/120 633/280   
   SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 2452/250 5020/545   
   PATH: 280/464 229/426