home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   LINUX      Torvalds farts & fans know what he ate      8,232 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 6,302 of 8,232   
   Maurice Kinal to Gerrit Kuehn   
   the eagle has landed   
   07 Feb 20 20:36:16   
   
   REPLY: 2:240/12 5d59a745   
   MSGID: 2:280/464.113 5e3dca40   
   CHRS: UTF-8 4   
   Hallo Gerrit!   
      
    GK> https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Clang-Kernel-2018   
      
   I had no luck with this until I upgraded to the latest git version of llvm the   
   other day.  The default master is clang-11.0.0 which managed to compile   
   linux-5.5.2.  I haven't properly compared that to the same kernel compiled by   
   gcc-9.2.0 yet but plan to later.  I am somewhat distracted upgrading to the   
   new glibc-2.31 as shown below;   
      
   -={ ':read !/lib/libc.so.6' starts }=-   
   GNU C Library (GNU libc) stable release version 2.31.   
   Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.   
   This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.   
   There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A   
   PARTICULAR PURPOSE.   
   Compiled by GNU CC version 9.2.0.   
   libc ABIs: UNIQUE IFUNC ABSOLUTE   
   For bug reporting instructions, please see:   
   .   
   -={ ':read !/lib/libc.so.6' ends }=-   
      
   As you can see I am booting to the glibc built by gcc and as of this writing   
   cannot get clang to compile glibc.  It (glibc-2.31 source) is currently   
   failing to configure using clang-11.0.0 as it claims the compiler is too old.    
   I somehow doubt that is true.   
      
    GK> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenMandriva_Lx   
      
   2020-02-01 -> OpenMandrivaLx.4.1-plasma.x86_64.iso   
   The above is the current version and the site claims to have clang-9.0.1   
   working as well as offereing two kernel v5 up for grabs; one compiled with gcc   
   the other with clang.  I haven't booted OpenMandrivaLx.4.1-plasma.x86_64 as of   
   this writing and I don't see any indication of which version of glibc they are   
   using or if indeed they are using glibc at all.   
      
   As far as my customized x86_64-pc-linux-gnu is concerned I am still behind as   
   far as getting a llvm to work beyond compiling a kernel.  As for the latest   
   release (llvm-9.0.1) it fails to compile due to issues with glibc-2.31 and   
   somewhat works with 2.30 although I couldn't get that version to compile a   
   kernel, nevermind glibc any version.  Beats me exactly how OpenMandriva pulled   
   it off ... if indeed they did manage to pull it off.  I'll know more once I   
   boot OpenMandrivaLx.4.1-plasma.   
      
   Anyhow any REALLY USEFUL information you might be able to provide would be of   
   great help.  So far all I've found is hype with absolutely zero evidence to   
   support the claim of a working clang that can successfully compile glibc ...   
   with or without patching the crap out of it.  In the meantime I am still more   
   than content with gcc and friends so no real panic to get a llvm based linux   
   system up and running.  :-)   
      
   Het leven is goed,   
   Maurice   
      
   ... Huil niet om mij, ik heb vi.   
   --- GNU bash, version 5.0.11(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)   
    * Origin: Little Mikey's EuroPoint - Ladysmith BC, Canada (2:280/464.113)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 103/705 154/10 203/0 221/0 227/114 229/426 452   
   SEEN-BY: 229/616 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 288/100   
   SEEN-BY: 292/854 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/120 633/280   
   SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 2452/250 5020/545   
   PATH: 280/464 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca