Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    LINUX    |    Torvalds farts & fans know what he ate    |    8,232 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 6,195 of 8,232    |
|    Maurice Kinal to Kai Richter    |
|    A Terminal and a Manual    |
|    31 Oct 19 16:09:46    |
      REPLY: 2:240/77 5dbaf14f       MSGID: 2:280/464.113 5dbb074a       CHRS: UTF-8 4       Hallo Kai!               KR> That's the great freedom of choice of open source software.              Agreed. However there is/was software that is part and parcel of every linux       distribution. For me gcc is definetly one of those and has been since I first       used it on Solaris based machines (Sparc stations) in the real world way back       when no matter what their purpose was. Also C and Unix did grow up together       way back in the late 60's when one wasn't possible without the other. I still       believe that is true and there would be zero linux (bsd's too) distributions       without a C compiler and gcc was there at the beginning.               KR> I was talking about servers in general. The job of a server is to        KR> provide service for specific task(s). A file server have to serve        KR> files, a web server have to deliver webpages.              I have yet to see one of those in the real world, nevermind here where I am.        Every Unixie machine I have ever encountered ALWAYS had a working gcc       enviroment since the late 1980's and continues to be true although I only have       access to the machines I currently am running. There are differences between       the linux I originally ran back in the 1990's and today but gcc is still at       the heart of it all.               KR> I see and understand why "your" systems need a dev environment        KR> but that is not required for "any" existing system.              Understood. I could easily replicate a non dev enviroment but I'd use gcc to       create it rather than rely on someone else's idea for such a crippled       machine(s). Having said that I am not sure what I'd need from such a system.        I am guessing it would sit in the corner collecting dust.              Bottomline is that LFS is an excellent document of how things fit together and       gcc is an integral part of that which makes it an excellent learning tool.              Het leven is goed,       Maurice              ... Huil niet om mij, ik heb vi.       --- GNU bash, version 5.0.11(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)        * Origin: Little Mikey's EuroPoint - Ladysmith BC, Canada (2:280/464.113)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/2 103/705 154/10 203/0 221/0 227/114 229/354 426       SEEN-BY: 229/452 616 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 292/854       SEEN-BY: 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/120 633/280 712/848       SEEN-BY: 770/1 2452/250 5020/545       PATH: 280/464 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca