Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    LINUX    |    Torvalds farts & fans know what he ate    |    8,232 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 6,063 of 8,232    |
|    Tony Langdon to Eric Renfro    |
|    Re: Linux Daily?    |
|    29 Jul 19 08:55:00    |
      TZUTC: 1000       MSGID: 908.fido-linux@3:633/410 21a37ee8       REPLY: 112.fido_linux@1:135/371 21a310c4       TID: SBBSecho 3.03-Linux r3.65 Dec 31 2017 GCC 4.6.3       -=> On 07-28-19 13:24, Eric Renfro wrote to Tony Langdon <=-               ER> I don't even recommend anymore, most anti-virus solutions. The only one        ER> I recommend anymore is Microsoft's, what was named "Security        ER> Essentials" before, not sure what Windows 10 renamed it to, but I        ER> recall they did rename it. Windows Defender or something?              That's all I'm using, but even though Microsoft's AV solution is better       integrated and works with, not in spite of Windows, it still causes some issues       at times. Yes, Windows Defender is a name that cropped up at some stage.               ER> A lot, pretty much darn well near all, started tapping directly raw        ER> into the network layer, and interpret straight from that. Well, guess        ER> what most viruses, malware, etc focus on a lot of? Interpretters. When        ER> you ADD an interpreter to the raw sockets, you expose more direct and        ER> confrontational means to get right down to the heart of the security        ER> tools. This is unwise, especially since there's been many        ER> vulnerabilities in that front too. :)              Yes, antivirus products have been responsible for a whole host of       vulnerabilities too. At least Microsoft's products are design to work       together, and haven't had to be hacked into the OS.               ER> Yeah. I do definitely miss some of the greatness KDE had. I don't like        ER> that Akonadi has become this monstrous beast of a thing that it        ER> probably should never have become because it's become a nightmare to        ER> maintain as it is. I mean, I even setup my mail servers to run Kolab,        ER> but now they've moved Kolab to being this commercial thing and they're        ER> stopping to maintain the GPL release packages they once did. So I'm        ER> going to eventually be tearing my mail server down and rebuilding it        ER> completely without any dependancies for the current design concepts.        ER> Build my own alternatives to some of the feastures Kolab provides, and        ER> have something I can just use and use well. It's a work in progress on        ER> that, but it'll definitely happen.              Well, good luck, which way you end up going. :) I only run mail servers when I       _really_ have to. Handling spam has turned running mail servers into a real       chore. :( And there's still a lot of bad setups out there. I've got one       account suffering a heap of backscatter from servers that bounce mail, instead       of issue a SMTP error during the session with the spammer's system (which       doesn't result in backscatter). I think the domain doesn't have any SPF       records either, which doesn't help. Backscatter is something I found a       solution for 15 or more years ago. There's no excuse for a mail server to       generate backscatter today.                     ... Sponge cake recipe: First borrow 3 cups of flour.       === MultiMail/Win v0.51       --- SBBSecho 3.03-Linux        * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (3:633/410)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/2 226/17 227/114 229/275 354 426 452 616 1014 240/5832       SEEN-BY: 249/206 317 400 280/464 292/854 317/3 322/757 342/200 633/0       SEEN-BY: 633/267 280 281 384 410 412 509 640/1384 712/848 3828/7       PATH: 633/410 280 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca