Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    LINUX    |    Torvalds farts & fans know what he ate    |    8,232 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 6,058 of 8,232    |
|    Eric Renfro to Tony Langdon    |
|    Re: Linux Daily?    |
|    28 Jul 19 13:24:36    |
      TZUTC: -0400       MSGID: 112.fido_linux@1:135/371 21a310c4       REPLY: 898.fido-linux@3:633/410 21a245fc       PID: Synchronet 3.17c-Linux Jul 26 2019 GCC 4.8.5       TID: SBBSecho 3.08-Linux r3.122 Jul 26 2019 GCC 4.8.5       CHRS: ASCII 1       NOTE: SlyEdit 1.67 (2019-07-21)        Re: Re: Linux Daily?        By: Tony Langdon to Eric Renfro on Sun Jul 28 2019 12:42 pm               ER>> Hmmmm... I mean, the imposed requirements of even having to have        ER>> "antivirus" software specifically is pretty much degrading even the        ER>> chances of having "better" in the vocabulary at all when it comes to        ER>> Windows. The fact you have to have something like that constantly        ER>> running just to prevent both infection and spreading alone...               TL> I have been pretty successful in the past at running Windows without        TL> antivirus.         TL> One just have to be careful. :)              I don't even recommend anymore, most anti-virus solutions. The only one I       recommend anymore is Microsoft's, what was named "Security Essentials" before,       not sure what Windows 10 renamed it to, but I recall they did rename it.       Windows Defender or something?               A lot, pretty much darn well near all, started tapping directly raw into the       network layer, and interpret straight from that. Well, guess what most viruses,       malware, etc focus on a lot of? Interpretters. When you ADD an interpreter to       the raw sockets, you expose more direct and confrontational means to get right       down to the heart of the security tools. This is unwise, especially since       there's been many vulnerabilities in that front too. :)               TL>> ER> For me, it started being a real issue around Cinnamon 4.x,        TL>> when it really started to get unstable. I've gone to using my old        TL>> trusty XFCE which has never let me down. Unlike KDE, Gnome,        TL>> Cinnamon, and pretty         TL>> much everything else to date actually, in terms of DE's.               TL> Fair enough.              Yeah. I do definitely miss some of the greatness KDE had. I don't like that       Akonadi has become this monstrous beast of a thing that it probably should       never have become because it's become a nightmare to maintain as it is. I mean,       I even setup my mail servers to run Kolab, but now they've moved Kolab to being       this commercial thing and they're stopping to maintain the GPL release packages       they once did. So I'm going to eventually be tearing my mail server down and       rebuilding it completely without any dependancies for the current design       concepts. Build my own alternatives to some of the feastures Kolab provides,       and have something I can just use and use well. It's a work in progress on       that, but it'll definitely happen.              )))[Psi-Jack -//- Decker]       --- SBBSecho 3.08-Linux        * Origin: Decker's Heaven -//- bbs.deckersheaven.com (1:135/371)       SEEN-BY: 1/120 123 14/6 15/2 18/0 103/705 116/116 123/0 25 50 115       SEEN-BY: 123/120 150 755 135/0 300 366 371 377 379 153/7001 7715 154/10       SEEN-BY: 154/30 40 700 203/0 221/0 6 226/17 227/114 201 400 229/275       SEEN-BY: 229/310 354 426 452 616 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 261/38       SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 292/854 310/31 317/3 322/757 340/800 342/200       SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 633/280 712/848 770/1 2452/250 3634/0 12 15       SEEN-BY: 3634/24 27 50 119 3828/7 5020/545       PATH: 135/371 300 3634/12 154/10 280/464 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca