TZUTC: -0400   
   MSGID: 95.fido_linux@1:135/371 219fd2cb   
   REPLY: 341.fdn_linux@3:633/509 219eab5e   
   PID: Synchronet 3.17c-Linux  Jul 23 2019 GCC 4.8.5   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.07-Linux r3.119 Jul 23 2019 GCC 4.8.5   
     Re: Linux Daily?   
     By: Deon George to Eric Renfro on Thu Jul 25 2019 07:19 pm   
      
    >> Hmmm... I don't much particularly like docker so much. I sort of liked   
    >> the idea of it when they were still using lxc concepts with it, but   
    >> when they switched to libcontainer, that... That pretty much ended it   
    >> for me for anything security-minded. Reliability minded too, actually.   
      
    DG> Oh, that's a shame.   
      
    DG> I'm a huge fan of docker. I like how I can shift stuff around fairly   
    DG> easily, and that I can seperate data (aligned with a specific version of   
    DG> an app) to an application container (of a specific version). It makes it   
    DG> easy to shelve stuff and revive it later (or backout of a failed upgrade   
    DG> fairly easily).    
      
   I mean, you can technically do all that without the need for docker or even any   
   kind of complex setup at all. Docker doesn't actually bring anything new there,   
   just more complexity in order to achieve it really.    
      
    DG> I too develop, on my MAC, so its no effort to get a container running on   
    DG> it, then using that same container on the (production) linux system.   
      
   This part, in more recent times anyway, is true, however... There are going to   
   be some unique differences in even that, which is partly a problem. Containers   
   definitely have some universal aspects they can do, and then they also have   
   some that will be hardware/OS different which can (and will) cause issues in   
   certain situations.   
      
   )))[Psi-Jack -//- Decker]   
   --- SBBSecho 3.07-Linux   
    * Origin: Decker's Heaven -//- bbs.deckersheaven.com (1:135/371)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/120 123 14/6 15/2 18/0 116/116 123/0 25 50 115 120 150   
   SEEN-BY: 123/755 135/0 300 366 371 377 379 153/7001 7715 154/10 30   
   SEEN-BY: 154/40 700 203/0 221/0 1 6 360 226/17 227/114 201 400 229/275   
   SEEN-BY: 229/310 354 426 452 616 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 261/38   
   SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 292/789 854 8125 301/520 317/3 322/757 335/364   
   SEEN-BY: 340/800 342/200 410/9 633/280 3634/0 12 15 24 27 50 119 3828/7   
   SEEN-BY: 5020/545   
   PATH: 135/371 300 3634/12 154/10 221/6 1 292/854 229/426