Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.co   
   !nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-o   
   line.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail   
   From: Blue    
   Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.suse,alt.os.linux.ubuntu   
   Subject: Re: An Ultimate Vista Problem   
   Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 21:57:36 -0600   
   Lines: 11   
   Message-ID:    
   References: <1pi5s294usu93gvhvlt0ulo71omtp8mmn6@4ax.com> <12s6qv   
   e2ffj2c4@corp.supernews.com>    
   Mime-Version: 1.0   
   Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1   
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit   
   X-Trace: individual.net 9nqwhStXvkj6llwkqZDikg0IDRxSGDwUGVRrpIuV/A0f+WYQdr   
   User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table)   
   Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.os.linux.suse:301673 alt   
   os.linux.ubuntu:9805   
      
   On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 19:08:25 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:   
      
   > This is pretty much the minimum if you want to be able to run Vista.    
   > With newer hardware (say, ATI X1900 or GeForce 7800 and Intel Core 2    
   > Duo), power consumption would be even bigger.  Don't you agree?   
      
   If it is working.   
      
   Now Vista, checks ones voltage on the graphics card 33 times per second.   
   DRM. So does that use power, is it needed? Globally   
   --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5   
    * Origin: Omicron Theta BBS (1:261/20)