home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   LINUX-UBUNTU      The Ubuntu Linux Distribution Discussion      10,769 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 8,859 of 10,769   
   sybrenUSE@YOURthirdtower.com.imagin to All   
   Re: Mounting Hard disks in Dapper   
   01 Feb 07 07:03:26   
   
   Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.co   
   !nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfe   
   d.freenet.de!feeder.news-service.com!68.142.88.77.MISMATCH!hwmnp   
   er03.ams!news.highwinds-media.com!txtfeed2.tudelft.nl!tudelft.nl   
   txtfeed1.tudelft.nl!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!82.197   
   221.145.MISMATCH!not-for-mail   
   Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.ubuntu   
   From: Sybren Stuvel    
   Subject: Re: Mounting Hard disks in Dapper   
   References:   <45C1C900.6000001@nolist.go>   
   Mail-Copies-To: nobody   
   X-TheAnswer: 42   
   Message-ID:    
   Mime-Version: 1.0   
   Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1   
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit   
   User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian)   
   Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 13:03:25 +0100   
   Lines: 31   
   Organization: Tele2   
   X-Trace: DXC=ZQaD5>VfPh9>dgEE=2AF8=6`Y6aWje^Y:BN5ledKT]Z755?fF46   
   HG3=9RJd]S6]Z5:4bNb@T=AN6   
   Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.os.linux.ubuntu:9441   
      
   runnerup enlightened us with:   
   > OOps, tks 4 remining me of the fstab !   
   >   
   > Should the entry there be the same as in /etc/mtab  ?   
      
   nah, afaik /etc/mtab reflects what's actually mounted.   
      
   > In my case, I have discovered that both my [ext3] HDs are already   
   > covered by the entries:   
   >   
   > /dev/sdb1 /media/D 160 ext3 rw 0 0   
   > /dev/sdc1 /media/D 320 ext3 rw 0 0   
      
   What are the '160' and '320' fields? And why do you mount both disks   
   at /media/D?   
      
   > and the folders already exist.   
   >   
   > Is it better to call it 'default' instead of 'rw' in the fstab   
      
   The 'mount' manual describes the "default" setting: rw, suid, dev,   
   exec, auto, nouser, and async, so it makes no difference really.   
      
   > & does that create a conflict with the mtab ?   
      
   Nope, if I'm correct about the meaning of /etc/mtab.   
      
   Sybren   
   --    
   Sybren Stüvel   
   Stüvel IT - http://www.stuvel.eu/   
   --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5   
    * Origin: Omicron Theta BBS (1:261/20)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca