Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.co   
   !nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfe   
   d.freenet.de!feeder.news-service.com!tudelft.nl!txtfeed1.tudelft   
   nl!feeder1.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!82.197.221.145.MISMATCH!not-for-mail   
   Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.ubuntu   
   From: Sybren Stuvel    
   Subject: Re: New to Ubuntu   
   References: <12s1eaqtba3jpcb@corp.supernews.com> <45c0cf10$0$972   
   3$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net>  <45c0e755$0$97262$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net>   
   <45c0f005$0$97234$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net>   
   Mail-Copies-To: nobody   
   X-TheAnswer: 42   
   Message-ID:    
   Mime-Version: 1.0   
   Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1   
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit   
   User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian)   
   Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 11:33:01 +0100   
   Lines: 15   
   Organization: Tele2   
   X-Trace: DXC=5BK=ZhNd]hSjkKH<@E26`Y6aWje^Y:chZ[Xe;eL2255?fF46   
   HG3Q93QM^HA:n=>WVhY\HS[S3   
   Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.os.linux.ubuntu:9437   
      
   Mike Easter enlightened us with:   
   > it is particularly appropriate to sign here.  Much of the time,   
   > these days, I surreptitiously sign other posts.  That is, I conceal   
   > a digital signature in the headers.  That's actually enough for   
   > protection against forged posts, and removes the annoyance factor.   
   > I will sign this message that way, so can examine the full headers   
   > of this message to see the effect.   
      
   What signing method do you use, and which software can verify the   
   signature?   
      
   Sybren   
   --    
   Sybren Stüvel   
   Stüvel IT - http://www.stuvel.eu/   
   --- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5   
    * Origin: Omicron Theta BBS (1:261/20)