Path: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.co
!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfe
d.freenet.de!news.albasani.net!dieschf.news.arcor.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Diesch
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.ubuntu
Subject: Re: Problems after installing Ubuntu (fairly long)
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:44:29 +0100
Organization: albasani.net
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <20070226024430.5ADF.0.NOFFLE@dieschf.news.arcor.de>
References:
<54c1pvF1vmfk0U1@mid.individual.net>
Reply-To: Florian Diesch
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: news.albasani.net G5RFMukOSwvSZ77GkNljOnxncMnGZ4EtyU1Qs
NmW5iNnyolnmVjv1GfP5+AwsJfJz4thUg2CUJS0YnJq0uATq2nW35qQr8gsQiuro
grfqSFqY8HF2Jq7vbDL2Zoo7W
X-Complaints-To: abuse@albasani.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:33:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-User-ID: ZdEqKeOcf1GB3PAf7eLgPoNFxFCbkzrsFzHZenB1uEI=
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: ShmUlKpOxlC7nKx+nnF4RYnlj6UyIBVSrJyilJbZizz
8OP5F6JCG5QlB6tvVvMWBNLz0haQQJJPDYrP3vjdxQ==
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.os.linux.ubuntu:11103
elaich wrote:
> dgk wrote in
> news:sf51u2t5rtvsjdqfec6csocdvdoshuko93@4ax.com:
>
>> So now I have a few comments and problems. Just about everything I
>> tried didn't work very well.
>
> I've been fighting with Ubuntu for about a month now, and am ready to
> give up. It's great for a) a novice user who only wants to use Firefox
> and a few other things, or b) an experienced Linux/Unix user who
> understands what it's up to. For someone like me, who likes to go beyond
> a) but not as far as b), it's hopeless.
>
> The problem is not Ubuntu. Ubuntu is the most user friendly distro i've
> tried. It's Linux. The file structure is incomprehensible. I was told
> that most apps install into usr/bin, but some don't. Why not? Google
> Earth installed into opt. And then refused to work. Naturally, no
> launcher was made for it, nor a link in the Applications menu, so I had
> to go looking for it. As usual, not only was I not told where it had
> installed, but was not given the option to choose where to install it.
> Why is this basic function (creating a link or launcher for a newly
> installed program) so inconsistent in Linux? In Windows, everything
> installs in /Program Files. Why is Linux different?
See "man hier" for some explanations about the linux filesystem
hierarchy.
> I spent most of the day today trying to edit slrn.rc, a simple
> configuration file. I am not allowed access, because I don't "own" the
> file.
You should not edit the global slrn.rc. Instead edit .slrnrc in your
home dir. See /usr/share/doc/slrn/FIRST_STEPS.gz and
/usr/share/doc/slrn/README.Debian
> The problem is that Linux is based on Unix, which expects a huge number
> of users who should be denied access to all but basic functions, and a
> handful of administrators who should be allowed access. Thus, access is
> difficult. Why should my computer, which I own, and of which I am the
> only user, refuse to allow me to edit a simple config file?
That's part of the security concept and a lot of people think that you
should do the same with windows.
Once you get used to it it's not a problem.
> Why should I jump through hoops for 6 hours and still fail? I looked
> up every resource I could find on the subject, and still failed.
Usually /usr/share/doc/ is a good starting point to find
informations about package
Florian
--
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5
* Origin: Omicron Theta BBS (1:261/20)
|
