On 10/21/2012 03:17 PM, Björn Felten -> Nicholas Boel wrote:   
    NB>> --- Mystic BBS v1.10 A20 (Linux)   
      
    >     This is an alpha version, right? Do you get the same, strange   
    > symptoms with 1.09 stable?   
      
   Unfortunately, I wouldn't be able to revert to 1.09 stable. There has been WAY   
   too many changes that I have already incorporated into my modifications of   
   this one.   
      
   I'm not sure why it's done this way, but lately it seems like people using the   
   1.09 stable version are persuaded to upgrade to the latest alpha, seeing as   
   though any bugs that were in 1.09, have been since fixed, the data structures   
   have been _completelely_ revamped (so the ones I use can't even be put into   
   1.09), and many other features have been added.   
      
   It's definitely not the way I'm used to, but it's the way the Mystic author   
   has done it for years.   
      
   I've already emailed him asking if he did anything to the original JAM code.   
   Just awaiting a response. Though in the meantime I might as well get as many   
   examples and possible scenarios as I can, in order to help out the effort   
   however I can.   
      
   --    
   Nick   
      
   --- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120923 Thunderbird/15.0.1   
    * Origin: The Pharcyde -- Purgatory Newsreader in Wisconsin (1:154/10.1)