MSGID: 1:154/10 6637754c   
   REPLY: 2:221/1.1 663717fd   
   PID: SmapiNNTPd/Linux 2.4.5   
   CHRS: UTF-8 4   
   TZUTC: -0500   
   TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-02-05   
   On Sun, 5 May 2024 13:24:12 +0300, Tommi Koivula -> Nicholas Boel wrote:   
      
    >> I get that. But, did you get that from some technical document that   
    >> that should be in use?   
      
    TK> Nope.. Just my own thing, something what soupgate does..   
      
   Ah, ok.   
      
    >> Or is this something you've just done yourself because FMail adds a   
    >> RFC-X-NO-ARCHIVE kludge?   
      
    TK> Nothing to do with FMail. Actually I cannot find anything like that in   
    TK> fmail docs or in the code. Maybe it is the GoldED of Wilfred that is   
    TK> adding that kludge. ;)   
      
   That's also possible. I just don't understand where the "RFC" prefix came from   
   for some of these headers (even the few already in use in Fidonet). I can't   
   find any reference to that prefix anywhere.   
      
      
   Regards,   
   Nick   
      
   ... Take my advice, I don't use it anyway.   
   --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderb   
    * Origin: _thePharcyde distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)   
   SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 120/616 123/10 124/5016   
   SEEN-BY: 128/260 135/220 225 153/757 7715 154/10 30 40 50 700 203/0   
   SEEN-BY: 218/700 220/90 221/0 6 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 206   
   SEEN-BY: 229/317 426 428 470 664 700 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464   
   SEEN-BY: 280/5003 5555 282/1038 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219   
   SEEN-BY: 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 256 1124   
   SEEN-BY: 467/888 633/280 712/848 770/1 2320/105 3634/12 5020/400 5054/30   
   PATH: 154/10 280/464 460/58 229/426