MSGID: 2:221/1.0 66367192   
   REPLY: 1:154/10 66366e5e   
   PID: JamNNTPd/Linux/IPv6 m32 mxo 20240504   
   RFC-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:115.0)   
   Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/115.10.1   
   CHRS: UTF-8 4   
   TZUTC: 0300   
   TID: hpt/lnx 1.9 2024-03-02   
   On 04.05.2024 20:20, Nicholas Boel wrote:   
      
   > On Sun, 5 May 2024 00:14:44 +0300, Tommi Koivula -> Nicholas Boel wrote:   
   >   
   >  >> BTW, is "@RFC-User-Agent:" a better choice over "NOTE:" according to   
   >  >> some such standards I don't care to read? I've noticed you recently   
   >  >> changed this.   
   >   
   >  TK> I wanted to "log" something from nntp client to kludges. So NOTE was   
   >  TK> changed to what the client sends.. Just for testing..   
   >   
   >  TK> X-SMAPI-Control: @RFC-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64;   
   >  TK> x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/115.10   
   >  TK> X-SMAPI-Control: @RFC-Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;   
   >  TK> format=flowed   
   >  TK> X-SMAPI-Control: @RFC-Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit   
   >   
   > Is that specific to Thunderbird and/or Sylpheed? I believe slrn and tin   
   > it doesn't use or display "RFC". It just sends "User-Agent:",   
   > "Content-Type:", and "Content-Transfer-Encoding:".   
      
   The "RFC-" part of the kludge was added by me.   
      
   'Tommi   
      
   ---   
    * Origin: jamnntpd/lnx (2:221/1.0)   
   SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 124/5016 128/260 135/220   
   SEEN-BY: 135/225 153/757 7715 154/10 30 203/0 218/700 221/1 6 242   
   SEEN-BY: 221/360 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 317 426 428 470   
   SEEN-BY: 229/664 700 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038   
   SEEN-BY: 291/111 292/8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66 234   
   SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/81 120 460/58 256 1124 467/888 633/280   
   SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 5020/400 5054/30   
   PATH: 221/1 280/464 460/58 229/426